Alright, all.
I apologize, I meant to get this bit of review submitted earlier but with how busy I've been, I haven't had a lot of time to spend on the forums aside from a casual presence.
That said, the 'Merican Puukko is on its way to the next person on the list and I've finally had some time to formulate my thoughts into what I hope is something somewhat coherent.
I've become rather interested in Puukkos lately and have been seeking out various examples in a somewhat casual sense. When I saw that
bikerector
had designed his take on a Puukko and was offering up an example for a passaround, I was certainly intrigued and offered to give it a try. To me, puukkos and other nordic style blades are rather fascinating - they represent an indigenous people that is not oft spoken of outside of some bushcraft circles. Even then, the knife isn't often attributed to the Sami people specifically, where it is likely the style originated. We think Finnish, Norwegian, etc. when, in fact, the style itself, alongside the Leuku, are used by the traditionally nomadic Sami people of Northern Scandinavia as a whole.
Today, the puukko making industry is rather considerable in Finland, Norway, and Sweden - with all three countries contributing some rather notable makers and companies. Even the more economical options are noteworthy (think Morakniv) and are lauded as being effective cutting tools in woodworking, bushcraft, and overall outdoor skills.
Historical and cultural significance aside, the puukko has always struck me as being one of the more comfortable and versatile knife styles out there. In fact, the maker Saku Honkilahti has said that a puukko should look and feel like a puukko whether it is visible or not (darkness, low light, etc.). He also says that a puukko should allow for at least 10 different holds - simple and powerful in hand without being overly burly or cumbersome.
That leads me to the 'Merican Puukko.
Immediate impressions demonstrate that it is comfortable in hand - it doesn't fill the hand like a traditional puukko tends to do and with the "dimples" or impressions shaped into the handle, it further deviates from what makes a puukko a puukko. That isn't a bad thing and shouldn't be viewed as a negative in any way. Everyone's hand size is different and one might value certain handle characteristics differently. I don't have gigantic hands but I do have large hands and wear an XL size glove in most cases - this knife feels good in hand and really, really shines when using a pinch style grip.
The blade itself has a sweeping clip shape to it and is ground with John's "Scandivex". John's O1 is excellent as always, making for a tough blade that takes a keen edge. Not as much belly to this blade as some puukkos and the clip gives it some flair that you otherwise wouldn't see but it is slim and nimble and has proven to be more than capable at a variety of tasks.
In a small to medium sized belt knife, I want it to be as efficient at prepping food as it is in doing finer tasks like preparing a fire and other related chores. Though the low scandivex grind isn't going to be as effective as a full flat grind when prepping food, the overall thin stock and good edge made short work of some potatoes - this will perform just fine at food prep.
I wanted to build a small fire so I used the 'Merican Puukko to prep some small bits of kindling, create some fatwood shavings, and throw some sparks. It did all of these tasks very well. I even created a bit of a featherstick.
In conclusion, I will list some pros and cons - please bear in mind that this is simply a matter of personal tastes rather than any real criticism of the design.
PROS:
- The knife is overall comfortable in hand, especially in a pinch style grip (which is a grip that I use when prepping food).
- The blade is light, nimble, and tough - one can accomplish a whole heck of a lot with a knife like this.
- Overall, it will be easy to carry as it is unobtrusive and lightweight.
CONS:
- Despite a comfortable handle, I still would prefer it to be thicker.
- The dimples in the handle tend to limit the grip options. Though I can get a nice firm grip on the blade when prepping wood, I notice the depressions and it throws me off a bit.
Overall, it's a good blade and I can't really think of any reason why one couldn't make good use of it. Though I do prefer the larger grips of more traditional puukkos, I feel that is likely more a matter of personal taste than anything.
Here are some comparison shots with other puukko like blades - only one being a Finnish made one.
Great job, John and Chad. I hope this proves to be a successful addition to your collaborative lineup.
Sláinte!