- Joined
- May 29, 2004
- Messages
- 22,740
The same one I paid from and you refunded to, at gmail com .Is it your mistic...email account?
Last edited:
The same one I paid from and you refunded to, at gmail com .Is it your mistic...email account?
Got it, thanks$ sent. Please check your PayPal...it has a different email (on my end) than thehomerjaysimpson...
Glad everything got resolved.
Edgefinder Im sure that the transaction wasn’t malicious...and I’m happy to see you stand up and refund the return shipping.
Learning experience all around.
One thing I noticed is that you are using the word “insured”, which doesn’t mean anything because if the knife that you send is lost, you would need to immediately refund the buyer, and then deal with any insurance claims on your own.I removed "as new" however, please tell me where in the rules or it is inappropriate to state "as new" If a knife has never been used, it is like a new knife.
Let me know what I did wrong?
Thanks,
Given your past listing issue, you may want to include more than just "Unused, unsharpened.I removed "as new" however, please tell me where in the rules or it is inappropriate to state "as new" If a knife has never been used, it is like a new knife.
Let me know what I did wrong?
Thanks,
This comment is not directed at Edgefinder - simply a personal opinion - general comment - regarding the use of INSURANCE for S&H for all Exchange transactions.
For what it's worth - my 2¢ - no matter that a seller states insured or not - I, as a buyer, consider that dealing with a BF member of good repute means that my purchase IS insured. If I don't receive the knife (or other) lost or damaged in transit the full value of the purchase will be reimbursed to me. Only the seller will "benefit" from the insurance.
My point concerning his most recent post selling the Dalton knives is that he stated they were "as new" unused and unsharpened. He has since removed the "as new" part.
When you look at all three knives - especially the STC, it has serious marks - you can clearly see the wear marks from deployment. This certainly is not as new.
Not piling on edgefinder here (I tried to keep an open mind and stay positive if you read my prior posts in this thread), but when he just went through this issue prior about accurately describing things - one would hope he would not be saying things are as new, when they clearly are not new. It's just another problem waiting to happen