OhioApexing
Sharpener
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2018
- Messages
- 235
expidia1 Nicely done! I was considering buying this very one!
I’m this close to buying a CN raindrop from a different seller, but the etching on yours looks much better. Congrats!
expidia1 Nicely done! I was considering buying this very one!
I’m this close to buying a CN raindrop from a different seller, but the etching on yours looks much better. Congrats!
I would like to sort a few comments made above. This discussion is not new and I always wonder how people are making general statements like "Devin Thomas dammy does this", "Chad Nichols dammy does that". What people seem to forget is that both makers do supply their dammy according to specifications given by CRK and what also seem to get lost during discussions is how the production process of a dammy knife blade goes. Neither DT nor CN are supplying ready to be installed dammy blades to CRK. They are supplying billets of whatever size. Then CRK cuts out the blade profile (or has a subcontractor doing this). Then the blade grind is done. Then the blade receives its heat treatment and at the end it will be etched, to bring out the dammy pattern.
This means that the todays appearance of both, DT as well as CN dammy, at CRK blades is a result of the specs given from CRK to DT/CN and of the etching process. Searching the net you will find lots of examples of DT as well as CN dammy blades used by other knife brands, with a different appearance then at CRK dammy blades. Just one example. This is Chad Nichols "blackout" damascus made for Spartan Blades Harsey Folder:
Harsey Folder, 05 by Jedi, auf Flickr
Harsey Folder, 04 by Jedi, auf Flickr
Harsey Folder, 07 by Jedi, auf Flickr
Question is (and only CRK and CN could answer that question), why a CN dammy blade at a Spartan Blades folder has such a different appearance than a CN blade at a CRK folder. Maybe CRK has some good reasons to do so. No idea.
Originally DT was supplying all dammy material to CRK, except a few special editions, where dammy from other dammy smiths has been used. Comparing pics you search at the net you need to be careful not to compare apples with pears. There are different periods of dammy during the last decades. Starting with non stainless dammy, which is always darker and shows more contrast than stainless dammy, due to its higher share of carbon. Additionally those non stainless dammy blades were coated, in order to prevent them from rusting. That coating further stimulated its high contrast appearance.
Then there was a transition period, where they still coated the blades, although already switched to stainless dammy. Accordingly these blades also showed a higher contrast. After stopping the coating the stainless dammy blades at CRK knives showed their more grey than black appearance which we know today.
Still that time DT was the only supplier of dammy to CRK. After the Spirograph pattern was discontinued, Raindrop, Ladder and Basket Weave remained. Until approx. 2012/2013 DT's Raindrop was showing the tight rolls and everybody appreciated that raindrop.
21, UG Morning Sun, Raindrop, 05 by Jedi, auf Flickr
According to DT who commented a thread here at BF a few yours ago about the change in the CRK Raindrop pattern, it was CRK asking him to change. It wasn't him who decided to change. After that decisions the DT Raindrop looked more lose, like this:
21, Bocote, Raindrop, 09 by Jedi, auf Flickr
Many CRK fans started complaining about the new Raindrop, including myself. Many preferred the old tight rolls as that clearly associates with "raindrops". CRK did listen to their customers and I think around 2016/2017 they changed their supply of Raindrop dammy from DT to CN. Ladder and Basket Weave has remained being supplied by DT. Since then we see todays CN Raindrop, which is back to the old days Raindrop, with its tight rolls and that was received very well by the CRK community. But I agree with you, that the CN Raindrop has a lower contrast and seem to "fade" while turning the knife/blade and having the light impacting at the blade from different angles. See:
21, Thuya, Nichols Raindrop, 02 by Jedi, auf Flickr
or ..... same knife
21, Thuya, Nichols Raindrop, 08 by Jedi, auf Flickr
I have no idea whether CRK, in cooperation with CN, is going to change this in future. Again. CN dammy blades at Spartan Blades Harsey Folder do show a mich higher contrast.
Ladder and Basket Weave (still supplied by DT) are not showing this effect. I have seen many examples of Basket Weave, which seem to appear a bit more "shiny" than Ladder. But even among 2 Basket Weave blades you may have variations.
21, Plain, Basket Weave, 11 by Jedi, auf Flickr
Ladder:
21, Elder Burl, Ladder, 07 by Jedi, auf Flickr
21, Gabon Ebony, Ladder, 07 by Jedi, auf Flickr
This is a Sebenza 25 w. Ladder and the dammy is much darker and has higher contrast than usual. Do I know why? No idea.
25, CGG, Ladder, 05 by Jedi, auf Flickr
The lesson I have learned during collecting CRK is that I prefer buying from dealers who are showing pics of their actual knives for sale and not archive pics of previously sold knives or cataloge pics. Because dammy pattern as well as wood color and grain can vary a lot, I prefer to see what I am going to buy.
Hope this helps a bit.
I’m not a fan of the wimpy looking Damascus patterns that disappear as soon as you rotate the blade. Some sellers and retail stores will oil them with WD40 which brings out pattern but it quickly wears off. The Minandi’s seem to use bolder patterns. Yours is beautiful, congrats.
From my experience the bolder more beautiful patterns seem to be only produced in limited special runs or sold at the blade shows at highly inflated crazy prices. This is why I prefer Damasteel over Damascus.
Many members display some knives with beautiful bold patterns. I always wondered if the moderators have first shot at those specimens as a bonus for them moderating. I don’t know as its something I‘ve always pondered since some have such extensive CRK collections with rare patterns.
My two bits:
The original Devon Thomas Raindrop blade on my 21 plain-Jane cracked at the thumb stud, as many CRK blades do. Just noticed the hairline crack one day.
CRK replaced the blade free-of-charge, but with a Chad Nichols Raindrop blade.
Although the Chad Nichols is a much tighter and more uniform Raindrop pattern, and arguably looks as if it took a lot of skill to achieve, the etch on my CN example was not as deep, and faded more quickly than my DT example. It’s not something I spend much time crying about, but I would say the DT Damascus had a more durable pattern when using the knife, and I lament the blade being replaced based solely on that.
It’s not entirely common, but the most numerous blade failures that occurred with CRK blades are a hairline crack at the thumb stud. It is an interference fit, so if the stud is slightly too large, or the hole slightly too small, the tension can cause a crack. It’s not specific to the Damascus blades, nor is it something anyone needs to worry a huge amount about, though CRK has a disclaimer now about putting new thumb studs in old Damascus blades.I did not know the thumb stud cracking was common but that's awesome that CRK replaced it! How common is this cracking? Have you treated the blade with any sort of protectant or noticed anything helps to preserve the finish? Unfortunately, it seems like many of the things we cut and the very oil on our hands is relatively harsh on the damascus finish.
I updated my original post today about EDC’ing a CRK Damascus. You might find out what to expect if you view my most recent pictures:Opinions please . . .
Background: I purchased a large Sebenza 21 CG raindrop handle here with a Damascus blade.
The owner damaged the blade by stropping and hitting the sides leaving shiny parts. Note: the lower blade is darker and the pivot area shows erosion because he acid washed the blade trying to repair it without protecting the pivot area. The acid wash also removed too much metal changing the blades CRK tight tolerances.
So before he was to resell it he sent it back to CRK and they put a new $300 blade on it.
I bought it from him sight unseen. What I did not know is that CRK replaced his blade with a Chad Nichols version which is the only one they now use for their large Seb. 21's.
I called them and asked if they had any Devin Thomas blades still in stock and they said no.
My issue: I happen to prefer the bolder raindrop design of a Devin Thomas blade rather than the tighter design of the CN.
See the two blades pictured together the lower one is the DT.
Also check out the pic of a new one offered on Ebay with the wood inlays. Check how it's all blurry from the angle they dumbly took that pic.View attachment 930948View attachment 930949
View attachment 930967
I personally can't see myself paying upwards of $200 for a Damacus blade that its pattern can only be enjoyed from certain angles, so I re-sold the Raindrop CN version here and also re-sold the DT blade that the owner damaged.
Between the two blades CN vs DT designs . . . Since I was able to view them both together in my hands, my issue with the CN blade was I had to view it at a 45 degree angle just to see the full Damascus pattern. As soon as I rotate this CN blade slightly the pattern started to get blurry and just turned to looking at a grey blade.
The DT blade does not start blurring away its pattern as much as the CN did (and its a bolder design which I prefer).
I think one of the issues why the design starts disappearing is because that the Seb 21 blade is not flat, it is very convex (which is part of it's extreme beauty of it's blade design).
I just picked up a Gold Class BM Foray with a beautiful bold Damasteel pattern and the Damasteel design does not start disappearing when rotating the blade (but the blade is not curved like the Seb.). I also had a DT Damascus Mnandi which was gorgeous, but too small for my tastes, so I re-sold it.
So now I'm still in the market for a Large Sebenza 21 with wood inlays and a Devin Thomas Raindrop blade.
I ask for opinions, because I like a Damascus blade but I'm not mentally locked into just Raindrop. If you own a Devin Thomas Damascus blade in a large 21 and in another pattern does yours turn grey and blurry when you rotate it?
Which pattern doesn't do this as much (I don't know maybe they all do it because of the 21's blade curvature).
In the threads, I see CRK was producing some of their models with Damasteel. I'd like to buy a used DT 21 now since its my only choice and then if CRK starts offering Damasteel in a 21, I'll flip the one I bought for a new Damasteel 21 version.
But for now, I don't want to keep buying 21's just to try different DT blade patterns.
What say you?
I'm curious what this looks like but imgur is showing an error message.The etch on my CN Raindrop Mnandi came straight off once I polished it with AutoSol, I much prefer it shiny, It's still very much visible, you can still feel it and if you run your finger nail down the blade you can hear it, its still all there, just smoother,
Oh, ill try and repostI'm curious what this looks like but imgur is showing an error message.