- Joined
- Sep 9, 2003
- Messages
- 2,361
One more note I would like to include. To all the other armchair metallurgist out there, I am well aware of the more involved nature of slip systems, twinning, rational and irrational habit planes, screw dislocations etc… but if I baffled the average readers by loading the thing with strain related formulas and Miller indices, I would be little better than the myth hucksters. Indeed I have seen impressive metallurgical terms used to intimidate would be doubters or questions. My belief has always been that all that is needed to recite the texts verbatim are the abilities of a parrot, but in order to truly educate, one must be able to explain the concepts in terms people can understand.
One of the most frustrating aspects of this type of writing is to have other metallurgically minded people use the general simplicity of such an article to knit-pick and split hairs for what ever ego boosts they receive by getting a technical slice of the action, when we should be on the same side! Which one is worse, leaving out that fcc slip is fond of {111} planes, or telling folks I can hammer my steel denser along the edge? The very basics are all that is needed to blow the latter out of the water. I appreciate the latitude and understanding from all the other metal-heads in this matter.
One of the most frustrating aspects of this type of writing is to have other metallurgically minded people use the general simplicity of such an article to knit-pick and split hairs for what ever ego boosts they receive by getting a technical slice of the action, when we should be on the same side! Which one is worse, leaving out that fcc slip is fond of {111} planes, or telling folks I can hammer my steel denser along the edge? The very basics are all that is needed to blow the latter out of the water. I appreciate the latitude and understanding from all the other metal-heads in this matter.