GB1 is actually a framelock with the scale over it. I sure hope the GB2 is the same (just means that the lock is beefier). Seems like it.
This is a confusing subject that I still don't understand quite as well as I would like to understand it. Maybe you or someone else knows something more that you can educate me on...
Spyderco calls the lock mechanisms on both the GB1 and the GB2 LinerLocks. And they're both very sturdy.
To the best of my understanding, the Michael Walker LinerLock and the Reeve Integral Lock (frame lock) are basically the same thing other than the LinerLock having a scale on the lock side. So I've been under the impression that saying "LinerLock" is the same as saying "framelock with a scale on the lock side".
The scale has a minor function in that it prevents the lock bar from over-extending but the function and strength of the locking mechanisms seem identical to me. This is equally confusing for me with knives like the Rubicon or the PPT. The PPT description from Spyderco states that the lock uses components from both the R.I.L. AND the Walker LinerLock, yet I don't see what the difference is between my PPT's lock and my Rubicon, or my Sage 1 (LinerLock) other than cosmetic differences and different metals.
Could it be that it is not a R.I.L. frame lock unless it uses Titanium for the lock bar material? If so, does that make the Rubicon a frame lock?
They ALL appear to be frame locks with scales over them to me. It seems that there must be a piece I'm missing here that explains why Spyderco says there are components of
both locks in the PPT lock. Can anyone tell me what the
specific difference is between LinerLocks and frame locks other than the addition of a scale on the lock side of a LinerLock?
Thanks in advance to the Spyder-genius that can clarify this one for me. :thumbup: