I'd say a rat-tail tang is a perfectly valid term in common use for a less-than-full tang which is wider at the "top" near the blade & tapers in either a slight curve or straight form to its narrow end. Like the tail on a rat, from whence the term derives.
Has nothing to do with quality, style of blade, or country of origin.
I thought the photos supplied were explanatory & illustrative, and I appreciated those who posted them.
I didn't mean to start a long expository thread, or to suggest that rat-tails were junk.
I simply wanted to know the general relative dimensions used on HI rat-tail tanged blades.
That said, and I am NOT saying HI rat-rails will self-destruct, rat-tails do carry inherent stress risers in the two 90-degree angles or corners where the blade is reduced to the top of the tang.
This is well known.
Quality-made knives by other makers (outside the khukuri world) have been known to snap the tang off at that juncture.
Again- I do not mean to say or imply that HI rat-tails are inferior.
I merely say I think the term is valid, I don't believe a rat-tail is AS strong as a full tang that doesn't have those stress risers, but I have no problem in accepting statements that nobody here has known one on an HI to break.
They appear to be up to the job requirements.
I didn't mean to start any long defenses or arguments, just wanted to see the relative dimensions.
I have standard knives with the rat-tail tangs & I have a good one with a stick tang (same thin round "rod-style" dimensions from the rear of the blade to the end of the tang.)
The tang type is A factor in overall strength, particularly on a chopper, but it isn't the ONLY factor.
Heat treatment, steel type & hardness, and bolster/handle construction also makes a difference.
As far as natural materials go, I've been discussing my own experiences with shrinkage on all three of my horn handles & asking for suggestions in dealing with it from others who have more experience in dealing with that than I have.
And, funny- I was searching WalMart aisles yesterday for sandpaper, brought some home to try out.
None of my questions or discussions have been to criticize HI products.
I don't buy these to hang on a wall.
Some of what I have are looking to be gifts and/or working tools.
As such, they have to have usable handles. I can't have one tearing skin in an emergency 150 miles out on the desert or at 9000 feet up in the local hills. Also can't have a cracked horn handle give out on me in the same places.
I'm trying to maximize their performance in & under those circumstances.
So far, of the five "serious" khukuris I have that are candidates for use or gifts, the full-tang chiruwa with the M-43 wood and the dual pommel attachment SEEMS to be the most rugged configuration for what I'm looking at.
I can adjust tang & rivet height as needed without bunging up wood too much, I'm just not as much of a hands-on craftsman as some of you guys are & I'm reluctant to be filing steel on horn handles. Or the brass pommel.
Looks like I'll have to on the one horn.
Clean it up the best I can, but it'll never come out as nice as it was when HI shipped it years ago. I don't have buffing equipment or a workbench with a vise.
Also bought some superglue, discovered the oldest khukuri has a new crack I didn't see before soaking it in the Balistol & then the oil.
My experiences tell me horn looks great, but is not a good match for where I live.
No criticism of HI.
Nepal has different humidity levels than my desert-ish environment & that's just a quirk of nature, not a fault of HI.
Future buys will simply have to be wood.
I'm working my way through the models & materials, and between what I have & what everybody's been kind enough to help with in answering, I'm finding what works best for me & my situation.
Don't mean to be stepping on anybody else's toes or preferences.
Denis