- Joined
- Jul 23, 2015
- Messages
- 12,521
I just tried ChatGPT last night for the first time. Do you use it, or have you used it? If so, how? Why do you like or dislike it? Feel free to share some of your ChatGPT interactions here.
Agreed, regarding technical information. It also has a disclaimer that says clearly that it can provide inaccurate answers, so people should go in with their eyes open.
Also agreed. I will elaborate on this in a moment.
ChatGPT sucks at chess, at least compared with an actual chess engine
I'm in partial agreement. I asked it to analyze some of my chess games, based on PGN notation I fed it from chess dot com. It was able to discern what opening I used, whether I had won or lost the games, and tell me who my opponent was. It also was able to tell me in the one game I spent the most time grilling it on, which move I had sealed my fate with. But I asked it to suggest a better move, and the move it suggested was actually a blunder. When I told ChatGPT that Stockfish said its suggested move was a blunder it said, okay let me reevaluate, yes you're right it is a blunder. A better move would be.... and then it told me an illegal move, ie to put my queen on a square that my queen actually could not get to on its next move. So I said you just suggested an illegal move, it said oh you're right, and suggested another illegal move.
It can give insightful analysis to poetry
I had it analyze a couple poems I have written. It gave pretty thorough analyses and even came up with insights I hadn't considered. I provided those in my sub forum in the thread with "Poetry" in the title. Of course, this doesn't mean it's "sentient", it definitely isn't. But it understand language and is highly responsive to it.
It is capable of crafting and manipulating a narrative
I then told it to write a story, using certain basic parameters (a crime story about an FBI agent facing false corruption allegations, but he has to solve a serial killer case before anyone else dies). It came up with something basic. I told it to add details, like the names of the victims and such, and it added a bunch of details, but it would only go so far.
So I asked it what its character limit is per response. It told me 2048. So I said can you write a whole novel in segments of 1900-2048 characters. It said no, but I can help you draft a synopsis (I paraphrase), and before I knew it, like within literally (and I don NOT use that word figuratively ) seconds, I had a a synopsis and abbreviated sequence for 12 chapters of an entire novel.
ChatGPT helped me craft a narrative at first wanting the perp (Jasper Grimes, a name I never would have thought of) to be a former FBI agent with a vendetta against the nameless FBI deputy director. David Wallace (the protagonist, and presumably given my first name to flatter me lol) faces false allegations, so I told it let's come up with a narrative to explain why Jasper Grimes is killing, and let's have him connected to the Deputy Director, and after a few looks at GPT's proposals and some tweaks, I ended up with:
Jasper Grimes is an art forger and curator of the art gallery (I removed his former FBI attribute)
Sophie Bennet is a young adult who happened to notice a discrepancy in a painting because she had recently learned about him in art class, she discussed it with a gallery staff member who assured her it was a legit variation in his work (and believed what he was saying) but she had the misfortune of being noticed by Grimes, who had a lot to lose if she should voice those concerns to someone who would take it seriously (the forgery he had on display was basically worth $40, but reputed to be worth $4 million)
Deputy Director Simmons is on the take. He is responsible for evidence going missing in a previous art forgery case in order to protect his lucrative complicity with Grimes. He clandestinely allowed for David to be implicated in the missing evidence, hence the source of the corruption allegations, and is planning to let David take the fall, but he acts reassuring and supportive towards him to keep up appearances and deflect suspicion.
Then Sophie Bennet turns up missing, David is assigned the case. This is as far as I got, so far, but the story already has a title: "Canvas of Retribution". There are twelve chapters worth of event sequences that I could continue to flesh out in a similar manner, and I bet I could have a fished novel within a few weeks, and it would be an interesting and compelling read. Of course, that's not what I want to do, so I will probably either abandon it or just gradually work on it in my spare time as a hobby.
But either way, I used to write short stories in high school, and never would I have come up with this narrative and detailed outline on my own, in less than two hours, and with so much detail.
I had it write a few poems.
It came up with pretty neat verses based on the criteria I gave it. But it doesn't seem to be able to follow my instructions to limit the poem to a certain number of verse, or to match the meter and timing of certain other poems.
My conclusion:
All in all, it's pretty amazing if you ask me. It's not sentient, per se, but in some ways it can think for itself, using its existing foundational knowledge. It's a far cry from the kind of computer interface depicted on shows like Star Trek, but it's definitely a huge step in that direction. AI is only going to get more and more powerful, which means it is a tool that can be used for great good, or great ill.
ETA:
That's because it's scraping resources like this forum to provide the answer. AI chatbots are just word prediction software that can Google much faster than you can. You're far better off doing actual research and listening to engineers than trusting anything any of them says regarding, well, any technical information at this point.
Agreed, regarding technical information. It also has a disclaimer that says clearly that it can provide inaccurate answers, so people should go in with their eyes open.
No. AI is far more than what you think. But I have seen far more people with this kind of mindset.
Also agreed. I will elaborate on this in a moment.
In the future you may be right, but current technology doesn't allow for anything even close to real artificial intelligence. All it's doing is finding what word most commonly follows another specific keyword and then comparing that to rules of composition and grammar. There's no concept of independent thought or reasoning at all right now.
ChatGPT sucks at chess, at least compared with an actual chess engine
I'm in partial agreement. I asked it to analyze some of my chess games, based on PGN notation I fed it from chess dot com. It was able to discern what opening I used, whether I had won or lost the games, and tell me who my opponent was. It also was able to tell me in the one game I spent the most time grilling it on, which move I had sealed my fate with. But I asked it to suggest a better move, and the move it suggested was actually a blunder. When I told ChatGPT that Stockfish said its suggested move was a blunder it said, okay let me reevaluate, yes you're right it is a blunder. A better move would be.... and then it told me an illegal move, ie to put my queen on a square that my queen actually could not get to on its next move. So I said you just suggested an illegal move, it said oh you're right, and suggested another illegal move.
It can give insightful analysis to poetry
I had it analyze a couple poems I have written. It gave pretty thorough analyses and even came up with insights I hadn't considered. I provided those in my sub forum in the thread with "Poetry" in the title. Of course, this doesn't mean it's "sentient", it definitely isn't. But it understand language and is highly responsive to it.
It is capable of crafting and manipulating a narrative
I then told it to write a story, using certain basic parameters (a crime story about an FBI agent facing false corruption allegations, but he has to solve a serial killer case before anyone else dies). It came up with something basic. I told it to add details, like the names of the victims and such, and it added a bunch of details, but it would only go so far.
So I asked it what its character limit is per response. It told me 2048. So I said can you write a whole novel in segments of 1900-2048 characters. It said no, but I can help you draft a synopsis (I paraphrase), and before I knew it, like within literally (and I don NOT use that word figuratively ) seconds, I had a a synopsis and abbreviated sequence for 12 chapters of an entire novel.
ChatGPT helped me craft a narrative at first wanting the perp (Jasper Grimes, a name I never would have thought of) to be a former FBI agent with a vendetta against the nameless FBI deputy director. David Wallace (the protagonist, and presumably given my first name to flatter me lol) faces false allegations, so I told it let's come up with a narrative to explain why Jasper Grimes is killing, and let's have him connected to the Deputy Director, and after a few looks at GPT's proposals and some tweaks, I ended up with:
Jasper Grimes is an art forger and curator of the art gallery (I removed his former FBI attribute)
Sophie Bennet is a young adult who happened to notice a discrepancy in a painting because she had recently learned about him in art class, she discussed it with a gallery staff member who assured her it was a legit variation in his work (and believed what he was saying) but she had the misfortune of being noticed by Grimes, who had a lot to lose if she should voice those concerns to someone who would take it seriously (the forgery he had on display was basically worth $40, but reputed to be worth $4 million)
Deputy Director Simmons is on the take. He is responsible for evidence going missing in a previous art forgery case in order to protect his lucrative complicity with Grimes. He clandestinely allowed for David to be implicated in the missing evidence, hence the source of the corruption allegations, and is planning to let David take the fall, but he acts reassuring and supportive towards him to keep up appearances and deflect suspicion.
Then Sophie Bennet turns up missing, David is assigned the case. This is as far as I got, so far, but the story already has a title: "Canvas of Retribution". There are twelve chapters worth of event sequences that I could continue to flesh out in a similar manner, and I bet I could have a fished novel within a few weeks, and it would be an interesting and compelling read. Of course, that's not what I want to do, so I will probably either abandon it or just gradually work on it in my spare time as a hobby.
But either way, I used to write short stories in high school, and never would I have come up with this narrative and detailed outline on my own, in less than two hours, and with so much detail.
I had it write a few poems.
It came up with pretty neat verses based on the criteria I gave it. But it doesn't seem to be able to follow my instructions to limit the poem to a certain number of verse, or to match the meter and timing of certain other poems.
My conclusion:
All in all, it's pretty amazing if you ask me. It's not sentient, per se, but in some ways it can think for itself, using its existing foundational knowledge. It's a far cry from the kind of computer interface depicted on shows like Star Trek, but it's definitely a huge step in that direction. AI is only going to get more and more powerful, which means it is a tool that can be used for great good, or great ill.
ETA:
Last edited: