Originally posted by Sierra912
"BP" in particular offered nothing to any discussion on the Forum that wasn't tainted with his narrow-minded, emotional, view of the world to include attacking any view, opinion, or commentary that he elected to take exception to. When offered the opportunity to readress issues and not people via a quieter tone and manner he proved incapable of doing so, to include his postings on this thread. It's the Few like "BP" who make cyber discussions of any merit a trial and tribulation, and in the end turn something meant to be fun, interesting, and perhaps an exercise in growth little more than a **** sandwich.
Greg, I have always respected you, I mean, for damned years I have. Some of the things you have done on these forums has been more than disappointing, to say the least. But everyone is entitled to their opinion, including you.
I think what you wrote about "bpman" is indicative of a problem you have on this medium and quite frankly, I'm at a loss for words as to how to go about describing it.
How on Earth are you going to blast the man now by saying that he had nothing to offer in the discussion when you
deleted his words?
Greg, when you say something and someone disagrees with you in a Magazine, they can write you and you have the final say if that gets published or not.
Here, you did not have that option and the general consensus I see is, you meant to exercise that option on this medium where it does not exist and where it does exist, it becomes a petty form of oneupmanship at best.
In other words, you treated the forum like a Magazine, you could not stop him from being published, so you simply deleted it.
There is more than one problem with that, but one of the main problems with it is, when you do that, people no longer wish to take the time to respond to anything. Why waste the time if it might get deleted if they disagree with you or someone else in the thread does?
I take the time, sometimes, because I can type faster than alot of people on here. Some people might spend 45 minutes typing out what I just typed. And you destroy it with two or three clicks of a mouse. Not cool friend.
Hey, there comes a time when one calls it like they see it, and I'm just sharing with the good folks who count out there - some of whom have posted their displeasure with how this all came down (and I thank ye very much, guys) and whose postings have caused toads in the road like "BP", and "Blues", and Leo D. to quiver and shake about how they've been "misunderstood".
You know something? There is nothing that anyone can post here that will damage you more than your own words. If you want to see someone that despises some of the things the Government does, that would be me. That is my right as an American to not like some things as long as I do not get violent about it as so many with criminal intent tend to do. But you just referred to two Federal Agents as "Toads in the road" and one has to think if there is anything you truly respect other than your own reflection in the mirror when you wash your teeth in the morning. Honestly Greg, it's about as funny as brain cancer.
As for Leo Daher, Leo is a special sort of man. He just came to this country after having visited it in the past and having fallen in love with it. He is everything America was supposed to be, a refuge from those that were oppressed. Where he comes from, it is damned near illegal to defend yourself and you damn sure cannot own some of the firearms there that you can here.
What was on that SF badge, Greg?
De oppresso liber... to free from oppression. Leo freed himself, he came here basically to get away from Policia who act like you do. Yeah, not a popular thing to say by far, the black hat mentality I talked about before. "They ban black hats, better not wear black hats on my beat."
So, you, a Police Officer, are calling two Feds "toads in the road" and a damned fine American as well...being Leo. Does not sit well, Greg.
Suck it up, lads. You screwed up and have been called on it. Welcome to the world of FK/FC editorial comment, courtesy of someone who has done his own work and continues to do so.
We already discussed that, you already turned the forum into a magazine by selectively removing what you wanted to.
Greg, the main problem with you, why myself and others had some issues with you, was the fact you will say something - state an opinion - then when asked about it, you won't answer or you get condescending about the whole issue. Then, when pressed, you consider the person "disruptive" or "rude" and right up "House Rules."
So, by doing that, what you are basically communicating is, "If you agree with me, we'll chat, if not, STFU."
Like it or not, this is what has happened. All of the other talk is mere dust in the wind.