Quite frankly as if they asked "What's the absolute cheapest steel you can hook us up with?"I dont mind a stainless offering but this seems like an awful choice
Quite frankly as if they asked "What's the absolute cheapest steel you can hook us up with?"I dont mind a stainless offering but this seems like an awful choice
not gonna flame Lynn or Cold Steel, but also probably not gonna buy one.
really really bad choice. price best be real low or those sales will disappear quickly.
WTF are they thinking, honestly?
Could be thinking, "Wow! Gerber gets away with 420HC in their "hard use" knives. Why can't we?"
Once upon a time, Gerber made top of the line knives. Not so anymore.
I'd hate to have to say that about CS.
Agreed x2. I see no reason for this change other than cost cutting. If that’s the case, so be it. But don’t treat your loyal customers like morons by telling them that despite your best efforts, you can’t source A2 of a high enough quality to out perform a United Cutlery level stainless. That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Even if that was true, are you saying there are no other higher quality carbon steels out there that will out perform 4034? Other makers seem to have no trouble finding it. Disappointing to say the leastAgreed 100%.
Quite frankly as if they asked "What's the absolute cheapest steel you can hook us up with?"
I’ll take up that torch, bro. I have no problem calling bullshit, and this sure smells like it.
Even if the price is low, I don’t expect spectacular results. WTF are they thinking, honestly?
Even ol’ bubba out there in the sticks who thinks Cold Steel is the best of the best knafs is gonna be able to tell these are crapola compared to the carbon steel versions.
Hell, they’re already using 52100 and they choose to go with this junk? Flame suit getting just a lil bit warm, Lynn?
You are misunderstanding the Chinese steel nomenclature.
"MoV" means that there might be some molybdenum and there might be some vanadium. There is no requirement that those elements be there. And if they are, there are no controls over the amounts.
Since there is no actual industry specification for "420HC" the composition will vary depending non the source of the steeel.
420HC might have Vanadium in it, but it might not. It depends on the source.
Latrobe 420HC contains .3% Vanadium. A lot of other mills don't add Vanadium.
Here's a data sheet from Allegheny Technologies, a major US mill. Their version of 420HC has no Vanadium, but might contain some nickel (note the asterisks and the note below the table. Nominal Carbon content is 0.44%):
https://www.atimetals.com/Products/.../ati_410_420_425_mod_440a_440c_tds_en1_v2.pdf
View attachment 1393989
Here's a product data sheet from ThyssenKrupp. One of the alloys covered is 4034
https://app.aws.org/mwf/attachments/1/56901/nirosta-und-thermax-GB.pdf
View attachment 1393980
View attachment 1393984
So, at the end of the day, Cold Steel is essentially using 420HC purchased from ThyssenKrupp as 4034.
I agree with the other comments. 420HC is quite a difference from A2, O1, or Carbon V.
And for a large tough knife, SK5 would be a lot better.
...
So, what is Cold Steel thinking?
True. But those issues have been here for years and nobody did anything about them meaning nobody cares.Yeah , except you can maybe mod or replace a sheath .
You can re-handle a knife .
You can't change the steel formula .
I took this advice today, and I think if anyone else wants a decent Trailmaster, they better follow it as well.Get those San Mai Trail Masters while you can! They probably won't be around much longer, and when they're gone.............4034???