- Joined
- May 28, 2013
- Messages
- 1,134
CRKDMike - Look, I get why you got upset and responded to me in your second post with your passive-aggressive personal attack, calling me "nuts", "undiplomatic", etc... You didn't like it that I insinuated that you had no self respect. I get that. It doesn't feel good when your character is questioned does it? Well, on that same note, why am I not afforded the same right by you, to be offended by your post since the jist of your post was "I didn't have a bad experience with Andre, and I don't really believe what these customers are saying, so anyone who doesn't buy one of his knives based on these accounts is "Strange". I mean, it's easy to make a bunch of unsubstantiated statements, of which you have no knowledge of, and then qualify it with "but that just my opinion". It doesn't mean that you are not responsible for looking at the facts and respond with reasoning when someone questions your opinion. When I asked you to speak to why you felt it was ok for Andre to not refund my money, you conveniently chose to avoid answering that, and responded with I am "nuts". If you completely ignore the facts that have been proven with the posted correspondence and Andre's own words himself, if you believe you are being objective, then you are lying to yourself. You are the lamp post, not us.
As for a couple of the statements you mention in your latest post:
"They can pick and choose who they make knives for and for whatever reason they want"
Agree 100%. But do they have the right to not refund your money after they decide that?
"...and they can demand anything they want"
I have to respectfully disagree with you there. I feel sorry for you that you feel that way.
"No issues, and Andre was super helpful"
So why does that give you the right to say we our experience and account of what happened isn't true? Especially in light of the fact that we have backed up our experience with the correspondence.
"That was the focus of my argument...Misery loves company..."
I thought you were just here to express your humble opinion, not make an argument? If misery loves company, and you hate to argue and be miserable, why did you make an "argument" to begin with?
"Practice active listening, be kind, considerate... Good luck everyone"
That's a funny way to end a post when you start your posts with things like "Your nuts" and "You guys would argue with a lamp post". I would say to you, practice a little self-evaluation and get rid of the passive-aggressive schtick.
As for a couple of the statements you mention in your latest post:
"They can pick and choose who they make knives for and for whatever reason they want"
Agree 100%. But do they have the right to not refund your money after they decide that?
"...and they can demand anything they want"
I have to respectfully disagree with you there. I feel sorry for you that you feel that way.
"No issues, and Andre was super helpful"
So why does that give you the right to say we our experience and account of what happened isn't true? Especially in light of the fact that we have backed up our experience with the correspondence.
"That was the focus of my argument...Misery loves company..."
I thought you were just here to express your humble opinion, not make an argument? If misery loves company, and you hate to argue and be miserable, why did you make an "argument" to begin with?
"Practice active listening, be kind, considerate... Good luck everyone"
That's a funny way to end a post when you start your posts with things like "Your nuts" and "You guys would argue with a lamp post". I would say to you, practice a little self-evaluation and get rid of the passive-aggressive schtick.
Last edited: