How could Mike Stewart be "left holding the bag", when he was already paid for the knives?
His expenses, including materials, time and labor, had already been covered in the agreed upon price had they not?
He could have thrown the knives in a lake and not been out anything couldn't he?
Then what of the $16k SS had invested?
Part of $16k, perhaps a substantial part, I don't know, had already been invested. So, as I wrote back in post #86 in this thread: What was Mike to do: Subtract what's invested in materials and labour, and send SS those materials and the remainder of the $16k? I'm guessing SS wouldn't have been happy with that either. Instead it seems Mike chose to carry-on with the project w/o SS and refund SS after he, Mike, could be made whole in the deal, too.
Perhaps there were missed commitments. Perhaps there were missed commitments
on both sides. Perhaps there were miscommunications. Perhaps there were misunderstandings. Perhaps a lot of things. Perhaps they should have committed
everything to paper, at the start, so neither side could later claim the other failed to meet their obligations? But one thing
is certain: Some portion of $16k had already been invested in materials and labour by the time the deal went south.
ISTM that unless you're out to put Mike's head on a pike, you
might consider how everybody's investment might best have been recovered, albeit not as fast as some might like.
Perhaps Mike
did screw SS. But possibly, just
possibly he did not. Thing is: I don't know. I don't know because I wasn't present during the communications between the two parties.