jdm61
itinerant metal pounder
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2005
- Messages
- 47,357
True. I am wondering how much more abrasion resistant CFV is at say 61-62 compared to the 52100? As I mentioned before, a number of years back, I asked Keven Cashen what simple and readily available steels he would use say for a mid tech line. he said O1 for blades under 5 inches and 52100 for the larger ones. The difference was O1 was more abrasion resistant and 52100 was tougher. So does CFV split the difference as best as you can expect? I ask because I still have a couple of hundred pounds of he stuff. Enough for say well over 300 bushcraft/hunter type knives.
Don't forget that 3V has almost triple vanadium content of Z-Tuff which can play significant role in edge holding.
So, my next question becomes, for a Canadian hunter in the winter, are you better off with 3v at Rc58, or z-tuff at Rc61? I’m leaning toward z-tuff.
I thought L6 would have matched or beat 8670.
Standouts for me through this are how good aeb-l is, how PM technology results in the balance of toughness/wear resistance in the z-wear/V4e group, and how tough 8670 is. Based on my experience with z-wear, I knew z-tuff would be very tough, but that tough at that hardness is impressive.