No it doesn't. If it did you would "fill the page" like you offered to earlier.
You are really, really wrong and should do some studies obviously. Regional religious base - you just make that up ? lol Are hindu and buddhist the same regional religious base ? They believe in completely different things yet come form the same region.
I used to wonder how a God who was so loving could command so many massive killings of people in the old testament but I realized one day that if evil people overtook the world who would God give his spirit to?
Ever hear of the new covenant ?You're free, of course, to interpret it as such. Of course it's a parable, but the relationship is obvious in context. Yeah, it is obvious, no command to kill others was ever given by Jesus. period. It was a parable about a man - not Jesus.
Do you really deny that there are no instances of commanded killing in the Bible or even killings by God himself? Double negative....but anyway. So what ? God gives life, he takes it away, who are you to judge God ? You are also missing a very important point, as usual it seems. When God commanded the tribes of Israel to kill - it was a specific time and place and people each time. It was not an open ended statement to kill anyone who is not Jewish any time you see them. Of course right there in the koran we have that statement many times over. we also see it practiced daily all over the globe. How many jews are running around killing people yelling in "Jehova's Name" How many muslims killing yelling "Akba Allah" ? The reason is simple the koran commands them to.
My point was that the Bible is not as flowery as people proclaim it to be. I never said it was flowery.
The murder of non-believers, killing women and children, genocide, etc. is there. OT only - unless you mean the romans killing the Jews in the NT
The rules are just as strict as the "evil" Koran, they're just ignored. You have never read the koran or surah or hadith it is so blatantly obvious.
Of course the NT is nicer than than the OT, but keeping the good stories from that and explaining away the bad is nonsense.
God gives life, he takes it away, who are you to judge God ?
When God commanded the tribes of Israel to kill - it was a specific time and place and people each time.
OT only - unless you mean the romans killing the Jews in the NT
You have never read the koran or surah or hadith it is so blatantly obvious.
Related ? obama is related to dick cheney so what ? does that mean they are the same, believe the same things ? Related doesn't mean they have the same values. jeez again.Of course it does. Rules on everything you do. Rules for who should be killed. The Bible is not that far off from the "evils" of Islam. Christians just ignore those parts. You have zero understanding of Christianity apparently. let us explain on more time slowly so you can comprehend - according to chritianity when jesus died there was a new covenant created, so "Rules on everything you do. Rules for who should be killed." blah blah went out the window. Which is obvious to anyone who can see and think clearly. Do Christians eat kosher ? oh no they don't. just one example. I could fill the page if you want. A simple check of jewish rules on living compared to christian rules will show a VAST difference. Why do you keep on trying to pile the OT stuff on Jesus and his followers when he came to replace the OT with a new one ? So saying "Christians just ignore those parts" really shows us how much you really know about the subject, because those parts were not for them to follow in the first place !! jeez.
You really think that Islam, Judaism, and Christianity aren't related? Of course they are. So are other religions from that area that they split into or got their stories from. Many discarded by now. Buddhism and Hinduism are different of course. They aren't Abrahamic religions. Hinduism is older than the others obviously.
Related ? obama is related to dick cheney so what ? does that mean they are the same, believe the same things ? Related doesn't mean they have the same values. jeez again.
Do you consider homosexuals to be evil and in need of death? Adulterers? Children that act out?
I'll attempt to pull quotes outta that mess, so bear with me.
Stating my opinion on the context of a book. I don't believe in God. You are the one who said "killings by God" what did you mean by that then ??
Stonings seemed pretty generalized quite a few times. Stoning was a punishment for a specific act, not something commanded to be done to all of a certain people. Get your facts straight.
Well, if you're gonna throw out the OT, then we can do away with the nice parts as well? I don't see this happening though. That is just silly.
It's been a long time on the Koran and I haven't read the others. I have a bit of trouble believing you've read the Bible as well, so I guess we're just stuck.
Honestly the red text is a bit much, and if you're gonna call me out on grammar (wrongly), you could at least try to capitalize. Not trying to be a pain, but you appear to be frustrated, and your posts are getting hard to read.
I was originally referring to "The Bible". In my mind that includes the OT. Tossing it out (or parts of it) seems like a cop out to me. That's all. I'm gonna bow out of this thread for now, as you seem to be melting down a bit.
You seem very frustrated right now complaining about colors, especially since you were the first on to use them, remember ?
I would be frustrated too though if I couldn't make a valid point.
P.S. On the grammar thing - "deny that there are no instances of killing ?" That is clearly a double negative. How could you even say that it's not ?
Capitalization shows respect - certain things and people don't get any from me, so that's intentional.
Bye.
Not frustrated at all, though I probably should've stayed outta the thread in retrospect, as I should've known it would just lead to back and forth with somebody. I'll answer your questions, and then hopefully we're done. If you want the last word, you're welcome to it, just don't leave me with a question.
A single line of red is not as hard to read as bold paragraphs. May just be me, but it hurts my eyes.
They seem valid to me. Religion isn't really something where an agreement is gonna be reached though, no matter how much one sees their points as facts. It is what it is.
I went to school in Kentucky.
Okie doke.
Peace.
I am not a Christian, but I have no issues with people believing what they want to. What I find disconcerting is people who don't try to better their lives. Yes, we all make mistakes, fall of the wagon, cuss, fight, etc. but if you make a conscious effort to improve your faults then you will improve as a person. The biggest mistake I see Christians(well, really, everyone) make is they ACCEPT their faults and don't try to improve themselves, relying on asking for forgiveness at the end of the day. I'm not saying you don't try to improve yourself, but your post seems to indicate that this behavior has become a pattern for you and I don't see any repentance for acts you admit are not becoming of a good person, just acceptance. That is a frightening road to go down, where does it stop? I'm sure there are lots of behaviors that could be "accepted" by an individual or even a culture that can be excused after the fact by asking for forgiveness, but are horrible crimes nonetheless.
This is what I don't buy into. God didn't do anything, or make any decisions for me. I made them. I don't understand the people who say "I was down on my luck, addicted to drugs, going down the wrong path. Then I found God and it turned me around." I don't understand that. Please explain to me how God did anything to directly affect your life. You are the one who changed. You are the one who realized you were living a terrible life with terrible ideals. If you changed at all, it is all your doing. If you changed, you wanted to, not God. It says more about you, than it does God.It takes decisions out of our own hands and makes us acknowledge...