scdub
Basic Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2004
- Messages
- 2,945
You should really try a Silky if you can. I’ve used a similar Corona side-by-side with a Silky and there was a noticeable difference in ease/efficiency of cutting. The blade on the Silky was noticeably thinner which is probably the main reason for the difference.My only interest in a folding saw is for backpacking, so size and weight are big considerations.
I chose the Corona Professional RS 7041 over the Silky F180 for a variety of reasons, though they were all based on having just looked at them, as I didn't buy both.
-The Corona's teeth are a bit more aggressive, so it should cut a little faster. It does not have finger grooves or the "humps" in the handle, which might be irritating if they don't gel with your hand/finger size, and cause hotspots in more extensive use with bare hands. The Corona's blade locks in the closed position, which the Silky's doesn't, and it's also less expensive.
Since I haven't used the Silky, I don't know if I'd actually see much difference in actual use. It appears to be more solidly constructed(bigger pivot and better lever for the locking mechanism, anyway), yet an ounce lighter if the claimed weight is correct.
Either would probably be fine for me, but I do know that the Corona hasn't disappointed in either performance or durability, as I've used mine for some pretty big jobs for such a little saw.
I'm always doing gear reviews and tutorials in my head that I never follow through on, but here's a couple of before and afters from when I've had enough spare daylight to do some trail maintenance:.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Edit to add: I use a Ranger Band (little bit of bicycle inner-tube) to keep the F180 closed - see pic in above post. Also FYI, on a small saw, smaller teeth can actually cut just as fast on hard/dry wood as larger teeth on green woods. My Super Accel cuts dry wood quickly.