OT: Wheelguns disappearing....

Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Messages
7,269
originally posted in Frugal's.

In New York, Only Older Officers Pack the Old .38
By MICHAEL WILSON
The New York Times
December 16, 2004

Roughly 19 out of 20 officers in the New York City Police Department carry the semiautomatic pistols that have been standard issue for 11 years, a boxy handful of steel and polymer as clean and smooth as many of their young faces.

This story is not about them. It's about the 1 in 20, and the old, heavy piece parked on that officer's hip like a jalopy at the top of the driveway. Wow, people say - look at that thing. Does it work?

An older model of sidearm was grandfathered in with officers who are, in some cases, grandfathers. It is thick, but elegant in its way, its grip curling lazily out of the holster, the grooves in the hammer like those around aging eyes.

It goes by many names - thirty-eight, six-shooter, pea-shooter, wheel gun - but the .38-caliber revolver is a dying breed on the belts of New York, soon to go the way of the rosewood nightstick.

Today, a few more than 2,000 service weapons are revolvers, down from more than 30,000 in 1993. Never again, the police said, will new revolvers be issued, and so the number shrinks with every retirement. Many officers own two guns, and some officers continue to carry revolvers off-duty, but again, that choice is no longer available to new recruits.

More than anything else, it is carrying a gun - the daily familiarity of it, the expectation that it must be used on a second's notice - that most sets apart the police from the policed.

And yet, choosing the gun was unceremonial, rushed and uninformed: pick up a revolver off a table, see how it feels, try the next one, then a third, then pick your favorite. Then, during training, the recruits learned to respect this piece of equipment that can take a human life. Now it feels strange to leave the house without it. They have come a long way together, these 2,000 officers and their revolvers. Uniforms have come and gone, and the belly under the belt has grown, but the gun hanging there is not to be messed with.

"Eventually, they'll all be gone," said Inspector Steven J. Silks, commanding officer of the firearms and tactics section of the Police Academy. "It's like people who like to have a stick shift. You take it away from them, they feel like they can never drive in the snow again."

In the early years of the Police Department, officers carried any weapon they chose, until Theodore Roosevelt, as president of the Board of Police Commissioners, ordered the 4-inch, .32-caliber Colt revolver to be the standard sidearm. Training with the guns began on Dec. 30, 1895.

Ninety-eight years later, in 1993, after much debate among the department and the unions and legislators in Albany, the department switched from revolvers to semiautomatics, primarily to meet the advanced weaponry carried by criminals and dispel the perception that the officers were outgunned.

The newer guns were easier to reload and held 15 rounds in the magazine and one on the chamber, almost three times as many as the revolver. Officers with revolvers were allowed to keep them if they chose, while rookies received the new guns.

So, the model of an officer's gun dates him or her like rings on a tree. The outer bands are the semiautomatic, 9-millimeter pistols. The next ring is much thinner, the brief period of the so-called spurless revolver, a gun with an internal hammer that for safety cannot be cocked. Finally, in the center, there is the classic revolver, such as the Smith & Wesson Model 10 or the Ruger Police Service Six, more commonly seen on "T. J. Hooker" reruns or film noir than on the streets of New York.

The grips still echo the earliest revolvers, designed in the 19th century to feel like the handle of a plow in a man's hand. Lt. Eugene Whyte, 45, with 22 years on the job, remembers arriving at a meeting for the Republican National Convention this summer, and men in suits quickly calling him aside, agog at his snub-nosed sidearm. "I had Secret Service guys asking me if they could see it," he said. "It was as if I was carrying a flintlock pistol."

It is not only fellow law officers who notice. Officer Andrew Cruz, 41, was posted in Times Square recently when a tourist did a double take at his revolver. "He said, 'Old school,' " the officer recalled. They get that a lot: "You're a real cop," or, "You must have seen a lot," or, "You must be getting ready to retire."

"They say, 'What are you, an old timer?' " said Officer Mark Steinhauer, 41, who joined the department in 1991. "My answer to them is, 'It worked for John Wayne.' "

The guys with revolvers, they say, are the same guys who married their high school girlfriends. Dependable. No surprises.

"It's put me through 20 years, and I'm still alive," said Officer Gregg Melita, 41, who not only carries a Ruger Police Service revolver, but the old "dump pouches," two leather carriers that hold loose cartridges. "This is when guns were guns, and cops were cops," he said. "The new guys don't even know what dump pouches are. They go, 'Hey, what's that hold?' " He chuckled. "'Bullets, kid.'"

The design of a 9-millimeter magazine, with a spring pushing cartridges in single file into the chamber, makes it susceptible to malfunction, to jamming. With a revolver, there is always another round ready to fire, no matter whether the one before it did.

"These aren't Ferraris," Inspector Silks said. "These are Chevrolets."

Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly ordered the switch to 9-millimeter pistols 11 years ago, and learned to shoot one himself. But it is his revolver, a Colt Detective Special, that he carries today, under the slight break in his trouser leg at the left ankle.

"It's easier to carry, for me, anyway, the revolver. I've carried it for a long time," he said. "I actually won it in the Police Academy, many years ago," graduating first in his class. It is inscribed: "Bloomingdale Trophy won by Probationary Patrolman Raymond W. Kelly. May 15, 1967."

As for the decline of the revolver, he said, "I don't think it means very much, tactically. I don't see that much difference in shooting a semiautomatic handgun or a revolver. The difference, people will tell you, is dependability. You take a revolver that's been in a drawer for 100 years, take it out, pull the trigger, and it's going to go off. Automatics have the potential, probably more so than revolvers, for jamming. At least, that's what people think."

Officers with revolvers say that yes, they feel more comfortable with a gun that is virtually malfunction-proof, and that six shots at a time, along with their extra six-shot speed-loaders, ought to be enough. "After 18 rounds, if I can't hit him, I'm in big trouble," said Officer Sean Murtha, 40, who carries two speed-loaders. (And he would be a statistical aberration. To date in 2004, the average number of rounds fired by a single officer in a police shooting is 2.8, down from 4.6 in 2000 and 5.0 in 1995.)

But there is something else about the gun. It makes a statement.

"It has to do with identity," said Officer Cruz, from the 88th Precinct in Fort Greene in Brooklyn. "You see someone with a .38, you know they've got some time on them."

Officer Melita, with his dump pouch, joined in 1986 and patrolled in Harlem for 18 years. He believes his gun shows younger officers that he was at work when times were different in New York. "That's how you can tell who's been on the job awhile," he said. "Back when it was, you know, wild."

Officers must appear twice a year at the firing range in Rodman's Neck in the Bronx. Detective Tomasa Rodriguez, with the Midtown South precinct, remembered the announcement for everyone with revolvers to step aside to a separate range. "It was embarrassing. All the young kids were looking at us like, 'Oh my God, these people, they're emotionally disturbed, they still have a .38,'" she said. "Before you know it, you're out of there. There's, like, two or three people. I told my partner, 'I was embarrassed at the range.' But I don't care. I like my weapon, I know how to use it."

The department had 2,367 revolvers in service in 2003. At last count this fall, that number had dropped to 2,019. Wait, make that 2,018 - Marty Paolino, 42, retired from the 88th Precinct a few weeks ago. ("I never wanted to go for the special training," he said on his last day of work. "They don't pay you enough.") Next year, with the expected retirements of officers who joined in 1985, a relatively large class of recruits, hundreds of revolvers will disappear from service.

It is too soon for eulogies, but not much. For an epitaph on the revolver's tombstone, consider two statements from two officers, six little words for why they kept their six-shooters.

"I hate change."

7th

"It looks cool"

Part of what may be an endless discussion. the shots fired statistic for NY is interesting.
 
I'd be hard pressed to think of a better all-around carrying piece than one of these old S&W modell 10's. Using a model 17 or 18, & a model 10, I used to teach a lot of folks to shoot. Model 19 is great cause it will handle the magnums, but to me the bread'nbutter of the S&W line has always been a model 10; in 2", 4" or 6". Using 12.5 grains of #2400 with a 160 grain hard cast bullet produces a good shooting & very accurate round in all of my 'old' model 10's & 64. Timing is easy double-action; you can feel the action cycle, hammer cock & the trigger release it. I doubt any of mine have been fired single-action more than 25 or 30 times in all their years. 'Course they were built back when the company actually had people that knew how to polish, so the bluing was great & they actually had people that knew how to fit a hand & tune a spring.Those old 5-screw M&P had as smooth an action out of the box as many do today after they've been worked on. Miculek has proven that speed-loaders aren't exactly archaeic. He is within 1/5 of a second of Ed McGivern's speed record. All of McGivern's guns were S&W model 10's (M&P back then) & were totally stock. He emptied a cylinder in 2/5ths of a second into a group that would fit under his hand at 18 feet many times. Most auto's, at least the ones he tested, would not cycle that fast.
 
I was one of the hold outs, when the DEA wanted us all to switch to high-capacity 9mm semi-autos. DEA started by issuing all new recruits Berettas, SIGs, or Glocks, later offering to issue same to older agents (allegedly for uniformity). Those wanting to hang on to their revolvers or Colt 1911s had to jump thru minor administrative hoops, and most experienced agents did just that. Eventually the day came when even those of us previously grandfathered were faced with direct orders to give them up. Operating under the philosophy that it is better to be tried by twelve than carried by six, I continued to carry my time tested S&W Model 29 in clear violation of our Agents Manual (dogma for narcs). Eventually the day came when the SAC in Detroit stopped me in the hallway, lifted the corner of my jacket and said " Lose the revolver. You know what the policy on magnums is. What kind of example are you setting as a supervisor?!!" BUSTED! After a brief period of negotiation ( Yes, guys, old agents can negotiate :D ) I was allowed to switch to a Colt 1911 in .45, itself not popular with the bureaucrats in Hqs, DC.
Today, I still own and shoot several S&W revolvers, but I have come to cherish five renditions of the basic 1911 design.

Having used both in actual combat, either will serve you well......
 
I will always have and use my revolvers. I carry them openly up at the deer lease where I hunt and fish. Theres just something relaxing and reassuring about a powerful wheen gun on my hip. Though my primary concealed carry gun is a 45 Colt Commander I sometimes carry an old Detective Special. Its not nearly so much the weapon as it is the man with the skill and mindset to use it effectively.

Ice
 
My first handgun(and possibly my first gun. Timeline a few years back there is rather hazy any more. and yes, it's only been a few years, I'm 25 :) ) was a 70's production Model 64, as already has been said, back when S&W still made a good gun(the wonderful domed punch should bring back memories for some others here. Luckily, I haven't ever had to remove the barrel yet, so don't own one). Now it's back down to being my only handgun again, and it's last gun I would ever sell or let go. I figure it'll probalby still be shooitng when I get ready to give it to my kids(which don't even exist yet), decades down the road. NIB near as I could tell when I got it, had maybe 3000rds through it, runs like a clock. ONLY times it's ever failed to fire was ammo problem(which is why I'll never buy S&B .38 special again). .38 isn't particularly powerful, my handlaods make maybe 700fps, but that gun fits my hands jsut right, and I trust my accuracy with that thing more than any other gun I'veshot(not that I'm some great shot). I know a 125gr or 158gr hp from Big Shiney(gun's name), is going to go where I want it, and know it's going to go bang every time I pull the trigger.
 
My gun habit has reached the point where once in awhile, even I look at all that I've accumulated and do a bit of a double-take. Single, double, pump and semi-auto shotguns; bolt, pump, lever, and semi-auto rifles (and a few blackpowders in there); and two safes full of nothing but handguns. I can shoot well with anything in there, and the revolvers probably outnumber the autos at least four to one. Revolvers just feel better, and if your skills are such that a difference can be told, they shoot a hell of a lot better too. I'm always really impressed when shooting a high-end 1911 or Sig--unless of course I make the mistake of bringing along an old Smith M&P or Colt Official Police the same day. When I make that mental slip, I'm forced to confront the fact that my expensive auto can just almost keep up with those old wheelguns...but not quite.

I'll take my old standby M24 with six 44 specials any day when my rear-end depends on it, and leave the "firepower" to the rest. It makes them happy, which is what really counts. :)
 
Let's not forget that much of the article addressed the old 38 Special; resurrected in modern loadings and then dropped by fear and 'peeveshness' from the major manufactureers. It was said the 41 died because the modern 38 Special thrived- well, it is very hard to find legitimate 38 Special Plus P loadings any more. (the 357 sort of negated the need for a 41 too)

I always ask myself how many rounds I'll get before it's over- and how many I need. I'd rather hit something once with a 41 than 3 times with a Nine.


munk
 
munk said:
I always ask myself how many rounds I'll get before it's over- and how many I need. I'd rather hit something once with a 41 than 3 times with a Nine.


munk

My experience with the wondernine mirrors yours.....don't bother :(
 
I think whatever you're comfortable with is the key. If you can get on target quickly and hit what you're aiming for consistently with a .22, you're formidable. A nine millimeter can be very effective, it's just not my preference.

Of course, Munk knows I'll never say anything against 41 mag. ;)
 
Of course you won't; you and I are gunbrothers and love the noble 41!!!

And the answer is of course being most comfortable and competent with what you favor.

My 41 will go through the car door, wall, or bush to get the assailent. Not for condo owners unless you've picked the loading carefully. (which you can- try a 210 gr lead bullet at 1000 fps)


munk
 
Jurrascic,

That amazes me that it would not be the officers choice. After all they are potentially putting their life on the line wonder why they should not be able to use whatever they want within reason?


Also considering some of the threads posted recently about police and others shooting like 100 times and not hitting anyone I'd think one well placed revolver shot would be better in many instances.
 
Good or bad it's hard to judge. The key to surviving a gunfight is be prepared. I don't care what caliber or type of handgun you use. Make sure you can hit what you are aiming at. That requires thousands of bullets downrange during the course of a year. Most departments require range qualification once a year. You average cop is probably no great shakes when it comes to ability to hit a target in a high stress situation. It's come down to spray and pray and hope not too many bystanders get mown down in the exchange.

I don't own any semi autos. I have three revolvers and find they can do anything I require.
 
Departmental policy, often driven by political correctness, determines what most officers carry. This is unfortunate, as what fitsyour hand, and what you can best hit with, has no part in the equation. A few officers bootleg what they prefer, but your retirement may be on the line if you do. My wife basically told me to forget the retirement, and "do what you need to do to come home safe". I had a few lucky brakes ;)
 
You know and I know that the pistol is not what's dangerous. It's the person shooting it.

That being said, if I had to equip a police department, they'd get autos. No question about it.

The reliability issue is beating a dead horse. A quality auto with quality ammunition isn't a problem to handle in this regard. Didn't go bang? Tap your magazine, rack the slide, and try again. Nine times out of ten that solved the problem...

...and that seems to be the main argument against autos, and it isn't much of an argument. There are malfunctions that I would much rather have in an auto than in a revolver. Bullet seated out too far? No problem in an auto, good luck with the revolver. Hangfire? Tap and rack in an auto; in a revolver, things can get messy.

But this sort of stuff doesn't happen in production ammunition. Or does it? I've seen both - and worse - in military ammunition too often for my tastes, almost always with 9mm. I won't finger the manufacturer here but they're very well known in civilian circles as one of the "good" companies. (Actually, their personal defense ammunition is what sits in my carry pistols.) The fact is, bad ammo does make it out the door.

Call me the devil's advocate - I won't argue. But, consider all the reasons behind the shift to the auto. It makes perfect sense for the military and law enforcement communities.

Should revolvers be banned outright? I don't think so. There's a certain "hitability" in that style grip, especially for those who were brought up on it. For most shooters, though, there are better options.

One particular concern of mine, from my own experience, is that when shooters have the option of what they carry, they want to carry what's unusual or "cool," not what's appropriate. Give the rookies the option to carry a revolver and you may very well wind up with a bunch of undergunned officers who don't know what they're doing - the opted for the revolver because that's what the old guard was using and those guys were
good.

Do you see where I'm going with this?
 
Satori said:
Should revolvers be banned outright? I don't think so. There's a certain "hitability" in that style grip, especially for those who were brought up on it. For most shooters, though, there are better options.
... the opted for the revolver because that's what the old guard was using and those guys were
good.


What is that line from Star Wars, a more elegant weapon, from a more elegant age?
 
Satori One particular concern of mine said:
good.[/I]

Do you see where I'm going with this?

Funny, in that it's my very same concern for a bunch of young guys who've grown up watching action movies where Bruce Willis, Mel Gibson, etc. are just spraying bullets everywhere. In fact, an oft-revisited joke in the Lethal Weapon movies is how much cooler Rigg's Beretta is than Roger's sixgun.

The biggest area of concern with automatics is the ease of operation. Many police qualify yearly with their sidearm, and other than that it stays in the holster. Some are interested in guns and pursue knowledge about them on their own time, but many don't know them very well--including what they're wearing on their hips. Obviously, the answer to any of the problems that any of us have talked about is training and lots of it, but that's a lot harder to address than simply changing the equipment.
 
Satori, Instead of one (or three) range officers telling the chief, "We know better what the guys need", a new officer should try several styles and calibers (within departmentally established boundaries) and be allowed to use that with which they can hit well. This also has a real world benefit; bad guys can't say "If the guy is carrying a SIG (or Glock, or S&W) he must be the man". This is not academic; this really has happened. I understand your concern about "cool' or trendy, but give today's new cops a little credit for common sense. I have three young men now graduating from high school, entering certain colleges at my suggestion, and heading for careers in law enforcement. All are of the type who would think their choices through, and listen to the advice of mentors. These are not my sons, but my students, and I have high hopes they will add well to the thin blue line.....
 
Satori, I think it's a little arrogant of you to speak of revolvers in the way you have. (and that's OK- Friends are allowed a little chuzpah, right?) But you picked the number one issue between the revolver vs semiauto as reliability. You're right- a modern, well kept auto is reliable. But that's not the number one issue, and does not answer the question. You've dismissed the revolver without a complete examination.

The revolver for a field officer, Border patrol, open spaces, desert, and forest is often a better choice than a semi auto. You know why, right? Because you have more power available to accomplish more tasks- the kind of diverse tasks an outdoors officer might have. A border patrol officer told me he uses a revolver for his job.

I wasn't kidding about going through a car door. Yes, some semi auto's will do that- (especially in today's doors) but show me the one going into the engine and stopping it, or through an 1 ton PickUp wall? The Outdoor officer can use the revolver. Animal, distance, natural and man made barrior.

Frankly, so could the inner city officer. If I were a DEA guy, I'd want a revolver, but with the distance liability and penetration issues it is more problematic.

munk
 
...oh, and for us civilians? I own revolvers and never looked back. Only reason I use semi autos now is the slide- kids can't pull it back. Most civilian gun battles over in what? 1 to 2 shots? 3? I used to use a 6 shot single action exclusively and you wouldn't have wanted to break into my Southern Calif home. ( or be a Lyman case tumber inside either...oops)

munk
 
If the chief is listening to the opinions of only two or three people, he or she needs to poke around the internet a bit. ;)

What boundaries? Who can decide this? Who should decide this? Everyone has their own experiences.

I will stick with this: all things being equal on the shooter's end, the auto is the better choice for law enforcement. Standardization in equipment brings its own rewards. Not everyone will have what they want, but most people will have what they need - a worthwhile goal for those in public service.
 
Back
Top