Let’s keep comments clean and respectful folks…
Ok, let’s try this.
First you will never reach 0% moisture … the forces driving condensation are just too high.
Second, after you remove wood from the heated drying environment, it will very rapidly (read minutes, not hours) pick back up moisture, even in a dry environment. The forces driving capillary condensation are that strong. You would have to be extremely fast in going from the drying environment to the resin to avoid that reuptake. Plastic bags aren’t really that great at blocking moisture (that is why metalized bags were invented) … so saying you should take dry wood and seal them in bags is misleading, because after a short time the wood will not be as dry as when it came out of the heated chamber (and so what people think is “dry”, really is not.
Third: the residual moisture will be present in the very smallest of the small pores. Many of these, probably most of them, are smaller than the resin could penetrate to, even under pressure (reason - water VAPOR penetration is not hindered by surface tension, and so will penetrate to, and condense in, the very smallest pores. Since the resin never gets to that “depth”, the presence of that residual moisture neither impedes, nor “pushes out” the penetrated resin.
Fourth, per the discussion above, *even with moisture present in the very smallest pores* the use of high pressure to overcome capillary forces to drive the resin into smaller pores (and thus just plain get more resin into the wood) is something the home stabilizer could never accomplish. There might be something of an issue if the pressures used are high enough to get the resin into the very smallest pores where the residual moisture sits (and the moisture would then “block” the resin … ) but my guess is that is not the case, and with the moisture below some critical level (apparently somewhere around 8-10%) , the resin and the moisture do not compete for pores.
Fifth, people cite K&G as a benchmark because of their commercial success. I personally believe that it is really hard to argue with that, regardless of the technical reasons why.