In my opinion, there is plenty of room in the GEC market space for an equal sized cutler to exist even thrive without hurting GEC one bit.
If the quality and patterns are up to the standards that GEC has set, there would be no problem selling knives. The present demand for GEC level knives is much greater than the current supply.
I would use the same formula as Bill Howard is using as well. Only 1095 steel on the old equipment. Small runs. Basic patterns to start.
There is actually a large hole in the SFO market as we speak.
I'm also a fan of winterbottom bone. I have a couple of Queens with it that are very attractive IMHO.I'm a fan of the authentic 60+ year old Winterbottom Bone. I know we'll never see that again on a Queen knife out of China, but maybe it could be used every once in a while on the new S&M knives. It is one of my favorite handle materials.
I wouldn't mind seeing some good quality stainless like 154cm (or cpm) or ATS34. Something along those lines.In my opinion, there is plenty of room in the GEC market space for an equal sized cutler to exist even thrive without hurting GEC one bit.
If the quality and patterns are up to the standards that GEC has set, there would be no problem selling knives. The present demand for GEC level knives is much greater than the current supply.
I would use the same formula as Bill Howard is using as well. Only 1095 steel on the old equipment. Small runs. Basic patterns to start.
There is actually a large hole in the SFO market as we speak.
I understand what you may like, however that is not following the formula that has proven successful.I wouldn't mind seeing some good quality stainless like 154cm (or cpm) or ATS34. Something along those lines.
I wouldn't mind seeing some good quality stainless like 154cm (or cpm) or ATS34. Something along those lines.
I understand what you may like, however that is not following the formula that has proven successful.
I understand what you may like, however that is not following the formula that has proven successful.
Also, apparently hard on old machinery.
One of the reasons given for GEC's rather limited stainless offerings is the expense and effort involved with tooling for it. Stainless is harder to work with and therefore causes a lot more wear on the machines as a result.
Now S&M/Queen was able to offer up different stainless steels so I do wonder if any of that tooling was bought with the equipment and if there might be plans to incorporate it in this sort of rebirth.
Personally, I am of the mind that the new S&M should keep things simple - offer up a tried and true steel in a small selection of desirable patterns. Hopefully, this will allow them to get their feet under them proper and will give the market something to chew on a little before they opt for more extravagant offerings and configurations.
Good point about wear on the tooling.
I think 154cm and ATS34 have been around long enough to be considered tried and true. I know the Red Trout with 154 I've been carrying is a gem, and its the knife I was thinking of when I made my earlier post.
Hopefully we'll find out more in a few months. In any event it will be good to have another US manufacturer of pocket knives to go along with GEC, Case, Buck, and Bear.
I did not say that it did. I simply said there is a successful formula out there and I would attempt to follow it for success.I seriously doubt that offering something other than 1095 is what caused the failure of Queen or Canal Street.
I understand what you may like, however that is not following the formula that has proven successful.
Let's not forget that S&M went out of business, that's why we are having this conversation.Let’s not forget the S&M File and Wire Annual Series offered ATS34
Let's not forget that S&M went out of business, that's why we are having this conversation.
I bet half y'all were mad the first time they did that because it wasn't "traditional ".
They also used 154cm, CPM154, and S30V...at least on the Trestle Pines knives, and I'm thinking on some S&Ms as well.Let’s not forget the S&M File and Wire Annual Series offered ATS34
I'm not against any of those steels, I'm just saying how I would restart a cutlery company with WW2 equipment.now Im not a huge steel snob, but sometimes its nice to have a knife in a steel other than 1095 especially for long term storage reasons.
From what i have read and seen posted on different forums, that was the problem with the demise of the Cutlery industry in the once great Sheffield. There was/ is a distinct lack of young people wanting to enter into the industry, and therefore the decline of the industry. I really hope that this is a very successful venture, i will be on board for a good well made, USA knife, so wishing all concerned the best of luck.I think the success of the S&M venture will lie on Mr. Cooper's ability to recruit machining, tooling and mechanical savvy people who will work for wages he will be able to offer.....