Ok....I set aside some time yesterday and today to work up another prototype.
Here's what I wanted to address:
- overall weight
- height of the blade
- perception of actual thickness
- more taper to the tang
- height and width of the handle
- more swell in the handle on top
- full flat grind - no shoulder
- no swedge
- very fine edge (0.008")
- more sheeple friendly overall
- more koster-esque in design
I made a few small but significant adjustments to the design in CAD....cut it out of 5160 (again...what I have on hand in 1/4" thickness that I can quickly heat-treat)....and handled it with some very nice and light leopard wood. :thumbup:
Weight of the first version = 5.2 oz
Weight of v.2 = 3.8 oz
Hard to believe...but I knocked nearly an ounce-and-a-half off an already light knife.
I made this one as an example of the other extreme...what you see below are 2 ends of the rope. v.1 is as beefy as I want to go....and v.2 is as light as I'd want to go.
Let me know what you think!!!
And now...the pics!
Overall pic
Comparison of v.1 and v.2
Spine shot
v.1 seems a LOT thicker than v.2 - but don't be so easily decieved. They are the same thickness right where the handle starts at the spine. Look again.
I also tapered the tang
quite a bit more...!
Underbelly shot
And I tapered the guard as well...so that it wouldn't be as thick (some folks don't like it 1/4" wide at the guard...some do).
3/4 view
It's easy to see how much bigger the v.1 knife is. The v.2 is no skinny slouch...it's thick enough...just that the v.1 is Beefy.
Side-by-Side
And now for the part that's gonna make SPXTrader's day....BOTH are headed your way for some testing. :thumbup:
Give 'em both a good workout and post a review here as soon as you can, Ok?
When you're done with v.2, just send 'er back for some TLC....
Dan