Ooooohhhhh - I like the spearpoint. In my mind, this project is taking a full-sized handle, attaching a relatively small blade, and making the balance work. The spearpoint definitely does that - and looks a bit odd as a result. Doesn't have to look pretty to work good, though.
You might want to extend the handle scales as far forward as possible. I think the AKTI standard is to measure from tip to scale, unless there is a very prominent guard. Better to bring the scales right up to the plunge line if you're trying to maximize blade length, so there is no question if someone wanted to make it an issue.
Question: Are you drilling the tangs at all, or relying only on the taper to reduce weight?
Some comments to your comments of my comments:
Yes...and the interesting thing is...at first glance, it does look like a knife with a 2.5" blade. I got that exact reaction from several different people - both knife knuts as well as sheeple. Innocuous, visually speaking.
The full-sized handle definitely makes the blade look smaller.
You'll have to hold it to believe it. The point is not to make a knife thick just because...but rather to take a thick knife and trim it down and make it usable/carryable. There are other knives out there in this size range....the "built like a tank" ones are too heavy....the "3 finger handle" designs are too short (not enough handle).....the thin bladed ones are too delicate for hard use....and so on.
I'll explain a bit more. It looks like v2 is thickest at the blade/handle junction, and the steel past the micarta starts tapering immediately towards the tip. Maybe that's because you rounded the top corners a little bit on the blade, while the v1 corners are square. Maybe you need that thickness to get a balance point near the index finger. If the extra steel isn't needed for balance, I would think that it would be more effective to make the part around the guard thickest, and taper both towards the tip and to the butt. The handle scale reinforces the handle, so the part under the scale can be thinner. Sort of like your carbon fiber ultralight knife.
What I'm exploring here is the idea of removing all those restrictions I just listed above...making a knife with no compromises...other than the 3" blade restriction.
Will keep that in mind.
Regarding my paring knife comment - most paring knives have a full handle with a short blade. They also tend to have ergonomics that range from OK to good, since food prep often involves many, many cuts and the paring knife is often the knife of choice for intricate work. Your design is making the steel a bit thicker, but the basic principles should be the same so maybe you can learn things (good or bad) from a time-tested design. .
Yes...it's hard to not notice all the Krein knives here in the shop ( :foot: )....personally, this one also seems to be inspired by Tom's PSK, Bushcraft and probably several others. I've talked to Tom about this one....asked him before I released it if he felt it was plagarizing his work...he was cool with it. BUT...that said, one BIG reason I went with the full flat grind on v.2 and v.3 is that it is more true to my style. I really like v.1 and I would not mind if Tom ever wanted to use it (not his way of doing things). But making the knife made me realize the reasons why I don't like to do them that way...
:foot:....I just work differently...have a different eye for things. In a nutshell....v.1 is cool, but v.2 and v.3 are more my way of doing things at the grinder. (ie...I really like how the full flat grind echoes the K5 & K6 Kardas....knives that are a pleasure to grind).
You and Tom both have your individual styles. Even if you two tried to copy each other's knives, the results would only echo the originals. Sometimes, comparison is a powerful tool for improvement. In my mind, I imagine you picking up the V1 in one hand, a Krein in the other, and going "that works better, this isn't as good, ..." I'm sure Bob Dozier's design aesthetic informed Tom's ability to make a knife that performs, even though their designs are very distinctive. No offense intended to your creative process. I know if your mark goes on it, it will be yours.