Bob Cargill Cripple Creek Knives

Found Bob's 1980 Catalog. There are extensive pictures of his Cargill folders, most of which featured his "Sidelock" mechanism, as he called it in the catalog. Also included is a copy of the patent of the mechanism, wherein it is called a "bolster-activated lock-back knife". In the catalog Cargill states the mechanism was licensed to Jim Frost, and the patent state Mr. Frost was the assignee of the patent. Cargill also stateas that he used mostly 1095 high carbon and 440 stainless and tried to take them to between 58-60 Rockwell for what he considered optimal hardness and edge holding. There are also two pages where he talks about the Cripple Creek knives and his wrecking his body from too much production of the Cripple Creeks. A lot of pages!
 

Attachments

  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 0.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 0.jpg
    226.1 KB · Views: 36
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 1.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 1.jpg
    260 KB · Views: 35
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 2.jpeg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 2.jpeg
    163.5 KB · Views: 37
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 3.jpeg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 3.jpeg
    200.3 KB · Views: 32
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 4.jpeg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 4.jpeg
    431.1 KB · Views: 34
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 5.jpeg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 5.jpeg
    347.7 KB · Views: 30
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 6.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 6.jpg
    278.1 KB · Views: 30
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 7.jpeg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 7.jpeg
    156 KB · Views: 31
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 8.jpeg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 8.jpeg
    161.6 KB · Views: 31
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 9.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 9.jpg
    79.5 KB · Views: 32
Last edited:
ten more pages
 

Attachments

  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 10.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 10.jpg
    109.1 KB · Views: 17
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 11.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 11.jpg
    69.5 KB · Views: 12
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 12.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 12.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 13
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 13.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 13.jpg
    93.3 KB · Views: 14
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 14.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 14.jpg
    90.7 KB · Views: 11
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 15.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 15.jpg
    55.8 KB · Views: 10
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 16.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 16.jpg
    64.2 KB · Views: 13
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 17.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 17.jpg
    74.8 KB · Views: 11
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 18.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 18.jpg
    83.1 KB · Views: 12
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 19.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 19.jpg
    100.5 KB · Views: 10
three more
 

Attachments

  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 20.jpeg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 20.jpeg
    197.5 KB · Views: 17
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 21.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 21.jpg
    155.1 KB · Views: 17
  • 1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 22.jpg
    1980 Cargill Catalogue (folders) & Patent 22.jpg
    86.5 KB · Views: 18
three more
Final two will have to wait--won't let me do them now. Actually the final two pages were copied from the pages of an old website that Bob had. I'll try to find some more of those pages since I copied most of that website pages. Most of that is about the Cripple Creeks.
 
Last edited:
A little more about his knives rather than as much about Cripple Creek as I thought. Interesting pictures and comments by Bob, however!
 

Attachments

  • Cargill Website (original) 5.jpeg
    Cargill Website (original) 5.jpeg
    330.7 KB · Views: 26
  • 1.jpeg
    1.jpeg
    421.7 KB · Views: 25
  • 2a.jpeg
    2a.jpeg
    296.3 KB · Views: 24
  • 2b.jpeg
    2b.jpeg
    307.4 KB · Views: 24
  • 3.jpeg
    3.jpeg
    311.3 KB · Views: 24
  • 4.jpeg
    4.jpeg
    364.7 KB · Views: 22
  • 5a.jpeg
    5a.jpeg
    292.6 KB · Views: 25
  • 5b.jpeg
    5b.jpeg
    243.3 KB · Views: 25
The last three with comments by Bob about his 24 blade barrel knife--a three year project! We used to joke about our Knife World first edition knife being one that was on the table (N˚s 1-500)
 

Attachments

  • 6.jpeg
    6.jpeg
    349 KB · Views: 27
  • 7.jpeg
    7.jpeg
    330.7 KB · Views: 25
  • 8.jpeg
    8.jpeg
    252.6 KB · Views: 24
Thank you for posting the literature!! It's great to read and see the stuff that one would assume was lost.
 
Good stuff. I remember these from his old website.
Greg
The original website I found was a part of some sort of collection of websites. When Cargill started a second website, the first one went down and I don't think he ever got the second one going. I was lucky to have gone ahead and made hard copies from the first site.
 
Cargill's inspiration for his 5 blade Sowbelly was the old Remington model. He mentions this in the Smoke Signals.
Greg

orig.jpg
 
Cargill's inspiration for his 5 blade Sowbelly was the old Remington model. He mentions this in the Smoke Signals.
Greg

orig.jpg
I was never especially fond of the sowbelly frame, but I did get a few of them. The best of those was the 5-blade stag from 1984. My favorite of all the stockmen patterns was, however, the LI1 small first pattern. In that first pattern, the 5-blade stag is absolutely awesome, I think! It's one of the several few Cripple Creeks I should not have been fool enough to share with someone else (well, sell to, but it's the same thing, in the end.) We're really only caretakers of these knives for a short time. CCC 5-bl. Stag Sowbelly.jpegOrig CCC LI5 Stockman 5 bl. Stag 1981.jpeg
 
Shields are on page 5 and the quantity of the 5 blade stockman can be found on pages 6 and 9.
Greg
 
I have enjoyed this thread for many reasons and have known that for some time now that eventually I would find one that I could physically handle and examine and buy if I liked it . Two days ago I did find a Stag Split Back Whittler and it did not take long to make up my mind . This one was made in 1986 and is No. 44 of 100 made . I had to take these photos inside , so the colors are not quite right , but the knife is certainly Right .





Not shown are the small Pen and Coping blades .

Harry
 
I have enjoyed this thread for many reasons and have known that for some time now that eventually I would find one that I could physically handle and examine and buy if I liked it . Two days ago I did find a Stag Split Back Whittler and it did not take long to make up my mind . This one was made in 1986 and is No. 44 of 100 made . I had to take these photos inside , so the colors are not quite right , but the knife is certainly Right
That split-back whittler appears to be pristine Harry. What a great example of Cargill's work! Kudos my friend.
 
I have enjoyed this thread for many reasons and have known that for some time now that eventually I would find one that I could physically handle and examine and buy if I liked it . Two days ago I did find a Stag Split Back Whittler and it did not take long to make up my mind . This one was made in 1986 and is No. 44 of 100 made . I had to take these photos inside , so the colors are not quite right , but the knife is certainly Right .





Not shown are the small Pen and Coping blades .

Harry
The Hawkeye club had a unique double. After this SBS whittler in '86, they followed with the three backspring whittler in '87. The 3BS seems considerably heftier than your SBS, Engineer! Don't know which I prefer--maybe both. Great knife!
 
Back
Top