- Joined
- Jun 25, 2017
- Messages
- 908
X
Last edited:
Finnish/Earlier Scandi axes - Kirves
- Thread starter Agent_H
- Start date
rjdankert
Basic Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2011
- Messages
- 2,565
IDK. It still has remnants of the paint embedded + dirt/age . Seems it would need some bare wood exposed and maybe magnification? If I end up sanding it or removing it I could post closeup pictures.
It is roughly 17 inches (43 cm). Is there a standard length (assuming 12/3) for that head? It's the first axe I've had in my hands of that type. It feels heavy in the head.
Thanks, I do too.
Bob
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2017
- Messages
- 908
X
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2017
- Messages
- 908
X
Last edited:
rjdankert
Basic Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2011
- Messages
- 2,565
I'm going to give it a try and go from there. If I keep it on, I think I will give it a name. The front runners so far are: shorty, stubby, and stumpy. Forum input welcome. A Finnish name would be good too!
The markings on the head are the one in the first picture in post #304 and these:
Similiar to this from post #199:
There was no paint on the head (except for what got slopped on from painting the handle).Kemi 12.3 Im guessing given my impression its overall dimensions:
Bob
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2013
- Messages
- 3,898
Bob, I seem to remember in the traditional Finnish log home building video we have cited and some of the pictures in the Suomi army photo sets having some shorter handles.
It may have been shortened but it might also have been intentionally done so. The Kemi heads are a pretty distinct shape and (if I am remembering right) there aren't models that shape smaller than the 12.3. It could have been someone's dedicated carpentry axe.
The use of a "." and "/" between the model and submodel marks might help to date it somewhat. As well whether the maker's mark is struck or raised.
My guess would be a 12.3. Of course I don't have it in hand but the 12.1's and 12.2's with that much bit would probably look a little more out of proportion on a 17" or so handle.
The worn submodel number doesn't look like a "1" to me - it covers enough area to be a "3" or a "2". I guess it could have been flattened a bit in use though. If you ever take it off the handle you might be able to rule out model versions by its weight as well. All of them I have handled seem to be a bit heavier than stated in the scanned catalogs.
It's nice regardless
It may have been shortened but it might also have been intentionally done so. The Kemi heads are a pretty distinct shape and (if I am remembering right) there aren't models that shape smaller than the 12.3. It could have been someone's dedicated carpentry axe.
The use of a "." and "/" between the model and submodel marks might help to date it somewhat. As well whether the maker's mark is struck or raised.
My guess would be a 12.3. Of course I don't have it in hand but the 12.1's and 12.2's with that much bit would probably look a little more out of proportion on a 17" or so handle.
The worn submodel number doesn't look like a "1" to me - it covers enough area to be a "3" or a "2". I guess it could have been flattened a bit in use though. If you ever take it off the handle you might be able to rule out model versions by its weight as well. All of them I have handled seem to be a bit heavier than stated in the scanned catalogs.
It's nice regardless
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2013
- Messages
- 3,898
My "new" kirves hanging with his (her?) new buds:
Bob
*I do, however, know how big that log dog is to make a rough comparison.
Still thinking along the lines of Kemi 12.3 from pictures. When I get home I can snap a picture of the same size next to a couple of models if you interested.
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2017
- Messages
- 908
X
Last edited:
rjdankert
Basic Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2011
- Messages
- 2,565
More imperfect stuff. Actually more imperfecter. Just for the heck of it I took a catalog illustration of a 12 series and made a template:
Then I overlayed it on the image from my previous post and sized it as best I could to fit:
3 7/8 in = 98mm. The catalog lists the blade width of the 12/3 as 90mm (3 1/2 in) and 1,1kg head.
Bob
Then I overlayed it on the image from my previous post and sized it as best I could to fit:
3 7/8 in = 98mm. The catalog lists the blade width of the 12/3 as 90mm (3 1/2 in) and 1,1kg head.
Bob
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2017
- Messages
- 908
X
Last edited:
I wouldn't dare to say that. Yellow Birch is non descript (ie plain) but plenty strong enough to qualify for axe handles. Never mind 'Google-reading' up on trees; get out there and discover what old-timers already knew from experience.
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2017
- Messages
- 908
X
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2001
- Messages
- 3,488
The further North you go, probably the birch is stronger as the growth rings are smaller. Years ago I worked with Klepper Kayaks, and we were told that Mr. Klepper only wanted birch for his frame ribs, that grew on the North side of hills in Scandinavia, as their growth rings were smaller. My Billnas handle is I think birch and has a shellac covering, which is original to the axe. John
Dang Bob, I usually pay no attention to lathing hatchets and toss them aside, but that is a remarkably fine and fresh example. What is it?My "new" kirves hanging with his (her?) new buds:
Bob
Sorry for the off topic Agent H but I just can't help myself...
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2017
- Messages
- 935
Is that a monster draw knife above the hachet?
