Zero Tolerance, and I'm not joking. The one's I've had (with the exception of the excellent slicing 0350) at too thick behind the edge, much like the Hinderer's I have. The Praetorian T that I frequently carry is a much better slicer.For the people saying they cut quite well, I have to ask, compared to what? I've seen the pictures of the food that they've cut and...that's not 'cutting well' by any stretch of the imagination. So I'm sincerely curious for those that own them, if both knives are sharp, what knives do you own that cut worse than a Medford?
That's fair. I guess I think there's hyperbole on both sides of the Medford debate. I know about how well a knife with a grind like that will cut and, to be frank, it wouldn't be my first choice for just about any cutting task for a folder (if I batonned my folders more often, like @stabman I might feel differently ).
On the other hand, I don't doubt that they are capable of cutting things, but I would absolutely cite that geometry as one of my main criticisms and something that would keep me away from the brand.
I'm sure Medford Praetorians cut just fine ... for a fantasy ax head. And for all the times guys mention X-Acto blades, no one carries them around and they won't slice a beefsteak tomato either. Not even radially. Not enough reach.
I'm sure Medford Praetorians cut just fine ... for a fantasy ax head. And for all the times guys mention X-Acto blades, no one carries them around and they won't slice a beefsteak tomato either. Not even radially. Not enough reach.
Just funnin'. The name Praetorian alone conjures up images of opera sets. But seriously, if it can't slice a tomato it doesn't go in my pocket. That's personal choice. Some guys tote Bowies around. YMMV.
Crazy!That's fair. I actually remember a thread where someone posted a tomato sliced up using a Praetorian, and it devolved into a three page argument where folks were CSI:NYing the ISH out of the pics. "Well, look, there's no juice in that one slice, showing that all the juice was smashed out by the cut!" It was an entertaining read.
Love the Adamas too - gave it to my son and he loves it. The Praetorian is a LOT better slicer.Crazy!
I took an Adamas out with me for a few nights last February doing some very basic winter camping. I didn’t pack any fresh tomatoes, I’ll admit, they were canned. But I did prepare a beef stew from scratch, using that fat blade. The carrots were not julienned, the potatoes were quartered, the onion roughly chopped and garlic was mashed. The herbs were dried to begin with anyway. It tasted damn good and kept me going for two days. Not the best kitchen knife, even for camping, but it also did everything else too, bar splitting the firewood, for which I used a fixed blade. It was a deliberate experiment and the Adamas acquitted itself very well indeed. I imagine a Medford would perform just as well and possibly better for all I know! Everyone should enjoy their knives and celebrate the differences.
Crazy!
I took an Adamas out with me for a few nights last February doing some very basic winter camping. I didn’t pack any fresh tomatoes, I’ll admit, they were canned. But I did prepare a beef stew from scratch, using that fat blade. The carrots were not julienned, the potatoes were quartered, the onion roughly chopped and garlic was mashed. The herbs were dried to begin with anyway. It tasted damn good and kept me going for two days. Not the best kitchen knife, even for camping, but it also did everything else too, bar splitting the firewood, for which I used a fixed blade. It was a deliberate experiment and the Adamas acquitted itself very well indeed. I imagine a Medford would perform just as well and possibly better for all I know! Everyone should enjoy their knives and celebrate the differences.
See, the Adamas is one that I owned and sold due to the poor cutting performance. It's a part of the reason that I'm comfortable criticizing the cutting performance of a Medford without having owned one. Could I cut things with the Adamas? Sure. Was it demonstrably worse at cutting them than pretty much any other folder I've owned? Yeah, pretty much. For prying apart furniture and general demolition, it was a beast, but I slice a lot more apples and tomatoes than I do armchairs.Crazy!
I took an Adamas out with me for a few nights last February doing some very basic winter camping. I didn’t pack any fresh tomatoes, I’ll admit, they were canned. But I did prepare a beef stew from scratch, using that fat blade. The carrots were not julienned, the potatoes were quartered, the onion roughly chopped and garlic was mashed. The herbs were dried to begin with anyway. It tasted damn good and kept me going for two days. Not the best kitchen knife, even for camping, but it also did everything else too, bar splitting the firewood, for which I used a fixed blade. It was a deliberate experiment and the Adamas acquitted itself very well indeed. I imagine a Medford would perform just as well and possibly better for all I know! Everyone should enjoy their knives and celebrate the differences.
See, the Adamas is one that I owned and sold due to the poor cutting performance. It's a part of the reason that I'm comfortable criticizing the cutting performance of a Medford without having owned one. Could I cut things with the Adamas? Sure. Was it demonstrably worse at cutting them than pretty much any other folder I've owned? Yeah, pretty much. For prying apart furniture and general demolition, it was a beast, but I slice a lot more apples and tomatoes than I do armchairs.
They have almost identical stock and the grind is about the same height. The Praetorian is hollow ground, the Adamas flat, saying they have nothing in common is ridiculous and demonstrably false. Now, which knives does the Praetorian cut better than?There is absolutely no comparison between the two though. You are not making a logical comparison. The Demko AD10 and CS 4Maxx also have thick blades in a sabre grind, and they slice pretty darned good. There really is nothing in common between the Adamas and a Praetorian.
I think that if you are going to post this you need to post the "receipts" as well, as the kids say.Plus he has been recorded saying he doesn't carry a knife along with unsavory statements.
Sorry, but your inexperience with the two is showing here. My Praetorian is A LOT thinner behind the edge then my (son's) Adamas. One is hollow, the other is flat. As I said - as an owner and user of both in question (Adamas [x2] vs Praetorian [x3 tanto + 1 drop point]) - there is nearly zero in common in cutting geometry. Not trying to argue with you IM, but your assertions are simply incorrect.They have almost identical stock and the grind is about the same height. The Praetorian is hollow ground, the Adamas flat, saying they have nothing in common is ridiculous and demonstrably false. Now, which knives does the Praetorian cut better than?
Okay, so does the Praetorian cut better than a Spyderco Military? A Cold Steel Recon 1? A Benchmade 710? A Buck 110? Thickness behind the edge is unquestionably important, but a short grind on thick stock absolutely necessitates an obtuse grind that's going to increase your coefficient of friction. That's just the unavoidable, unalterable physics that come into play.Sorry, but your inexperience with the two is showing here. My Praetorian is A LOT thinner behind the edge then my (son's) Adamas. One is hollow, the other is flat. As I said - as an owner and user of both in question (Adamas [x2] vs Praetorian [x3 tanto + 1 drop point]) - there is nearly zero in common in cutting geometry. Not trying to argue with you IM, but your assertions are simply incorrect.