Peter Hartwig
Gold Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
- Messages
- 5,441
It's not really been about knives, it's been about the perceptions that should be expected from people based on a combination of behavior and characteristics of the knife chosen for public or social use, and whether we care about projecting perceptions that are nonthreatening or threatening to people in general.
Some people are more considerate, and some people are less. One of these two dispositions is more selfless, the other more selfish. One is more conducive to a peaceful and harmonious society, the other is less. We all know whether we gravitate more towards the one or the other disposition based on how much we care about others' peace of mind, and what steps or actions we take or omit to respect, or disturb it.
You can be a jerk with a SAK or like this guy-a good guy with a knife on the other extreme end of choices. In this case the knife fit the task well. Seat belts are pretty tough . You can choose almost(there may be an exception not coming to mind) any knife and be a good member of the knife society(for better term), or you can be a jerk with almost any knife. IMO this guy showed the world it isn't the knife but the person behind it. He helped the knife community rather than hurt it.
There always have been and will be extremes in choices and those that want something different or have different needs.
We're not going to all carry SAK's and even their very presence can alarm some. Carry what you like, but be aware of it's possible effect on others when using.
If I did carry a karambit(which I doubt I ever would), I would pair it with something more practical and less showy. For many tasks that knife is useless and it certainly will draw attention. I would do the same with a Hinderer XM-24
My local news station has run the clip multiple times, but never shown the knife
Last edited: