How do you figure? More often than not, our opinions are on the same page or very close to it but, this time, I have to disagree.
Unless I have missed something, the only place in the rules that list clones, counterfeits, etc. is the Exchange. The only other area that I find anything close is Site Rules, Section 7. That section, as you know, has to do with keeping things legal. Not circumventing the law of the land, trying to get around import laws, and such. No real reference to clones, etc.. Is there anything else in the forum rules (other than what I listed above) that limits our discussions about clones and counterfeit products? If so, I don't know about it. I don't see how they are off limits except as listed above.
I think you and I can agree that counterfeits can damage the knife industry. Can we agree clones, copies, etc. probably do very little that's positive to help the industry or our hobby? Maybe they act as a gateway knives for owners or collectors. Maybe. It could be easily argued that they cause more harm than good, though. No question that they can be a grey area.
Part of the problem is that, as members, we can't agree on a clear definition between clones, copies or counterfeits.
One member may view all three as counterfeit and claim they are all wrong. With him, it's all black and white. To him, your are slime if you even consider owning one. Another will be against clones but copies are fine if there is no deceit on the part of the producer or seller. A third member may feel that copies are acceptable with the belief that they are good for the industry. Another thinks that copies are OK if they are produced locally but heaven forbid they are made overseas. As we all try to voice our opinions on this issue, somebody's toes are bound to get steeped on.
As I read post here on the forum, I see members character attacked or, at least their morals questioned if they even bring up the topic of clones. You've seen it, too. Maybe you have even been a victim. Fortunately, it does not seem to be too bad at the moment. If clones can damage the hobby, what can happen when we attack the morals of our fellow members?
Maybe, just maybe, if forum rules clearly defined copies, clones and counterfeits, there would be less chances, or reason to verbally bring members morals up for questioning. Directly or otherwise. Of course, you may be right. Defining them might not make any difference.