- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 3,821
Have Jo do it for you.
Hey maybe she likes bowie knives... there is still a chance
Have Jo do it for you.
It was worth a try !
Nice one, J & J. Pardon my extremenosinesscuriosity but when I see Roman numerical, I will have to figure it out! XXVLII? 10 - 10 - 47, as in 10-10-1947? Jonny looks in tip top shape for a 70 YO
Lol! Close. XXVI.II with two dots under the “I”s. Planning to add another one in December.
Aha! I had thought that the first I was an L!. OK then, you're turning into a calendar?!
Not quite. Lol! Twenty-six point two is the number of miles in a marathon. I’ve run 2 so far and currently training for my 3rd, which will be in December. I got into running about 11 years ago when I needed a huge lifestyle change. Dropped 65 lbs in the process, so running a marathon was a huge accomplishment for me and the first big milestone for the new me.
This one, I would've never ever been able to guess, i.e, what 26.2 signified and neither would the other 99% of the lazy arsches in here
Good on Ya Jeannie
91bravo
Didn't want to clog up the WTB/S/T thread but if I had to give you a pure guess as to whether the production BC handle scales would PERFECTLY swap with and fit the scales on the prototype BC versions, my answer will be: "very doubtful".
Again, I have not tried this but my opinion is based on Nathan's past post somewhere stating that the production BC will have some progression in its handle area as opposed to its prototype predecessor. This to me means that if swapped, the handle scales may not line up perfectly.
I can’t “like” this post, but thank you for confirming.The handles for the production BC are not interchangeable with the prototype BC. The holes line up but they do not fit the profile.