- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,937
I don't know. Perhaps some of the frustration Del has experienced comes from opinions that multiple makers have proffered to answer the original question which boils down to geometry and the intended cutting task. After those answers, there are comments like:
"I don't think there is a consensus on the subject"
"so far, I don't understand"
"I really don't understand why secondary bevels are used at all"
"the question remains, why not just use a single bevel to zero"
"again, why are they used"
Then again, maybe we're all being duped by a conspiracy to preserve microbevels. I can see the utility of a simple scandi grind, but the function (and aesthetics) of a small secondary (micro) bevel make that knife preferred to me.
BMK, I appreciate your desire to learn and the fact that you're asking questions that most people do not. Please be patient with us as we strive to be patient with you .
--nathan
I've said it once, I'll say it again, BMK is a troll. and should be fed to the sharks for exactly this type of behavior. There comes a point when the annoying 6 y/o "But Why?" questions need to be put to rest. Especially after MANY sufficient and obvious answers have been given.
Jason