IDK, something still doesn't make sense to me with this situation. I'm sure Balls can explain though...
If the fraudulent transactions occurred between July and October, why didn't it get reported to the credit card company until November?
Also, presumably when it was reported, Balls told them which transactions were fraudulent. If Balls was disputing specific transactions, why would the credit card company charge back all these legitimate transactons?
If the fraudulent transactions occurred between July and October, why didn't it get reported to the credit card company until November?
Also, presumably when it was reported, Balls told them which transactions were fraudulent. If Balls was disputing specific transactions, why would the credit card company charge back all these legitimate transactons?