@gmarthur: I'm not sure if the purpose of the micarta inlay is to embelish the knife.
I understand it should improve the grip and that's probably the reason for the 2 piece design and the wider gap.
red mag
I saw it at SHOT and I believe it was a prototype- having said this I was less interested in how the inlays looked but rather how great the knife felt in my hand- more purchase and that grippy Micarta.
However they turn out in production may or may not appeal to all aesthetically but once you hold it you won't want to put it down.
Neil Ostroff / True North Knives
I'm really on the fence with this design. At a glance I really don't like it (still), but wonder if it will creep into everyone's subconscious and we'll all end up being ok with it after some time. I wonder if it's like that machining hole in a 21. Let's face it, it's pretty goofy to have a large hole in the middle of the handle on a Sebenza Regular, or 21, and maybe it's even more goofy to put a sapphire in it? But after years of looking at these knives with that random hole in the slab, most (not all) of us accept it, and maybe even like it and look for it. I can guarantee that if the Sebenza 21 and Regular had no machining hole in the handle, and Chris added a hole in the handle of the new 25, people would be freaking out about it. So I guess what I'm saying is I'm going to give it time to steep in my brain, but won't be rushing out to pre-order it.
I respect most everything that CRK chooses to do, and even remain neutral on the "Idaho Made" controversy.
To put it frankly, the inlaid 25 looks like hell. It looks like the first idea that someone sketched out on a diner napkin, with no refinement or afterthought at all.
If it feels good, great. Though, I agree with Haze. It is absolutely possible to have them be both ergonomic and aesthetically pleasing. So far, they are missing the mark.
All just my humble opinion, of course.