- Joined
- Aug 17, 2014
- Messages
- 4,914
My total post count = 606
Your total post count = 4626
I don't know man, I'm not good at math but I think 4626 is alot more than 606...
Still not convinced.
My total post count = 606
Your total post count = 4626
I don't know man, I'm not good at math but I think 4626 is alot more than 606...
Well I do have a life outsider of forum posting...
So far the responses I read through this thread can be summed up into four categories:
1. Most responses are personal attacks against me or my screen name
2. Then there are responses with attacks on China, their ethics, slave labor, etc... It's possible other Chinese knife makers operate unethically or getting government subsidies, ok it's possible and maybe that's why TwoSun can offer much more on the value proposition. However this further proves my point, why is the China made Tenacious more expensive than the Taiwan made Rat 1?
3. Some tried to explain cost increases because of increase in labor, inflation, higher cost of US operation, cost to fight counterfeiting, advertising cost (i have yet to see any commercials on knife companies, and Spyderco benefits from direct advertising without the need for market research because of forums like this and Spyderco's own forum, it's a competitive advantage that's not existent in other industries so don't tell me about your assumption of "market research cost") etc... Note, Ontario is also a US company and we can assume they incur all the cost Spyderco does. Why is it the Rat 1 did not increase in price at all over the last decade? NO ONE HAS PROVIDED A PLAUSIBLE ANSWER TO THIS
4. Other responses are in one form or another fan response from knife nuts that lacks any logic to the argument... "spyderco is worth it", "I'm willing to pay whatever Spyderco asks", "Sal's a great guy and listens to his fans", "Spyderco is great, Ganzo is garbage", "I'm carrying Spydercos today, post your pics if you are too" etc... I mean come on, really? I said in the original post that I think Spyderco is worth whatever price anyone is willing to pay for it as everything else in life.
Furthermore, I remember from my college cost accounting class that manufacturing overhead costs for an unchanged product goes down with time. And Tenacious would long have reach the breakeven point. The machine setup cost, blue print cost, worker training cost, specialty machine and die cast cost etc... would of all have been recouped by now resulting in the Tenacious costing less now than it did 12 years ago to produce. (I concede labor cost probably went up but as we know, labor in China is dirt cheap, President Trump has told us so repeatedly)
And please please read your own post before posting and stop posting stuff that makes it seems like Tenacious is not made in China, you are sabotaging your own argument.
Let's bring another two knives into the mix, Shaman and Slysz Bowie. Fans complained about their cost and compared it to other knives with similar materials made in their respective U.S and Taiwan facilities. Sal punched his key board "the rounded handles cost more to make" and fans grumbled but otherwise shut up and ate it up. I'm sure it cost more to "round the handles", let's not even bring in other knives from other makers with rounded handles and their relative price. Let's just talk about the increase in price because of the "rounded handles" relative to other similar knives made in the same facilities. When anyone tries to tell me a 70% to 100% increase in retail price is due to additional machining cost for rounded handles? I call BS on that one too... It's simple supply and demand, they're hot knives and people will pay more, that's it.
I agree that the price increases are a bit much. The RAT is a great example of your point. You won't find much dissent for anything Spyderco does on Bladeforums. It's mostly earned, but as you've noticed the discussion just will not happen.
The issue is the accusation that went along with it. If you want to discuss whether or not the Tenacious is overpriced, that's an extremely different conversation than if Spyderco is lying about their pricing model. Honestly, as an enthusiast, I'm not interested in dropping $50 on a Tenacious. That's more than I feel the knife is worth to me. That said, it's one of my most frequent recommendations to my friends that aren't into knives because it's well made, won't break the bank, the steel is an excellent choice for inexperienced sharpeners and it's backed by an extremely reputable company and warranty.I agree that the price increases are a bit much. The RAT is a great example of your point. You won't find much dissent for anything Spyderco does on Bladeforums. It's mostly earned, but as you've noticed the discussion just will not happen.
It is not the same thing to have a discussion about the price increase of Spydero's products and calling Sal a liar because somewhere he said material costs went up.
The issue is the accusation that went along with it. If you want to discuss whether or not the Tenacious is overpriced, that's an extremely different conversation than if Spyderco is lying about their pricing model. Honestly, as an enthusiast, I'm not interested in dropping $50 on a Tenacious. That's more than I feel the knife is worth to me. That said, it's one of my most frequent recommendations to my friends that aren't into knives because it's well made, won't break the bank, the steel is an excellent choice for inexperienced sharpeners and it's backed by an extremely reputable company and warranty.
While I would love to do that but I don't fall for group think and I like to challenge the status quo.
As President Trump taught us, there's great fallacy in group think. In 2016 everyone said he will loose, all the research and poll numbers said he will loose, yet he won against everyone's expectations.
All I can say is the RAT 1 is a great $25-30 knife and the Tenacious is a great $40-50 knife and I'd be fine carrying either.
We work on relatively fixed margins. We sometimes make less for a variety of reasons, but I don't think we're using price "to make more profit". As I've said before, we believe that "charging as much as the market will bear is biting the hand that feeds you". We need to be able to keep our good people, buy equipment, grow, and try our best to please our customers.
We make a fairly large variety of designs and materials because our customer base is quite varied, and because we're able to, for which we feel fortunate.
As mentioned, we cover a broad price range and we have customers in the entire range. We try to give our customers what we think they will like. Some models have a smaller audience, either because of price or design. That doesn't stop us from offering our designs to those smaller audiences. They appreciate our efforts..
Knives like the Paysan, machined from a solid piece of Titan with very close tolerances, or the Drunken with it's spyder web liners, special texture and many years of the skill of the maker are specialty items to be sure. They are certainly difficult to make. That's why they cost more.
...
I will also say; Just because you cannot see the reason for the cost, doesn't mean it isn't there, it just means you can't see it.
I was trying to explain the "why", because I understand it and you don't. . Is it what it is. We have customers that do want and do purchase the higher end. Certainly not as often as the lower end. Way more fords out there than Aston Martins.
I would also like to say that to complain about the price without ever handling or seeing the knife is a bit strange to me. Some folks will pay high prices for art that others just don't see.
We haven't sold to Amazon for the past year. Yes, it does hurt us, but we couldn't get them to work with us and we don't think it fair for them to be our only dealer.